From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>,
Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 11/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move to single device multiport ports in switchdev mode
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:27:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328132742.12070-12-leon@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190328132742.12070-1-leon@kernel.org>
From: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>
Move from IB device (representor) per virtual function to single IB device
with port per virtual function (port 1 represents the uplink). As number
of ports is a static property of an IB device, declare the IB device with
as many port as the possible according to the PCI bus.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/ib_rep.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/ib_rep.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/ib_rep.c
index 7946cf26421b..224ef6c88d17 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/ib_rep.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/ib_rep.c
@@ -46,17 +46,36 @@ static const struct mlx5_ib_profile vf_rep_profile = {
NULL),
};
+static int
+mlx5_ib_set_vport_rep(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep)
+{
+ struct mlx5_ib_dev *ibdev;
+ int vport_index;
+
+ ibdev = mlx5_ib_get_uplink_ibdev(dev->priv.eswitch);
+ vport_index = ibdev->free_port++;
+
+ ibdev->port[vport_index].rep = rep;
+ write_lock(&ibdev->port[vport_index].roce.netdev_lock);
+ ibdev->port[vport_index].roce.netdev =
+ mlx5_ib_get_rep_netdev(dev->priv.eswitch, rep->vport);
+ write_unlock(&ibdev->port[vport_index].roce.netdev_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
mlx5_ib_vport_rep_load(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep)
{
+ int num_ports = MLX5_TOTAL_VPORTS(dev);
const struct mlx5_ib_profile *profile;
struct mlx5_ib_dev *ibdev;
- int num_ports = 1;
+ int vport_index;
if (rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK)
profile = &uplink_rep_profile;
else
- profile = &vf_rep_profile;
+ return mlx5_ib_set_vport_rep(dev, rep);
ibdev = ib_alloc_device(mlx5_ib_dev, ib_dev);
if (!ibdev)
@@ -70,8 +89,9 @@ mlx5_ib_vport_rep_load(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep)
}
ibdev->is_rep = true;
- ibdev->port[0].rep = rep;
- ibdev->port[0].roce.netdev =
+ vport_index = ibdev->free_port++;
+ ibdev->port[vport_index].rep = rep;
+ ibdev->port[vport_index].roce.netdev =
mlx5_ib_get_rep_netdev(dev->priv.eswitch, rep->vport);
ibdev->mdev = dev;
ibdev->num_ports = num_ports;
@@ -89,7 +109,8 @@ mlx5_ib_vport_rep_unload(struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep)
{
struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev;
- if (!rep->rep_if[REP_IB].priv)
+ if (!rep->rep_if[REP_IB].priv ||
+ rep->vport != MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK)
return;
dev = mlx5_ib_rep_to_dev(rep);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
index 7eca3978c50c..57d269c1b874 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
@@ -506,9 +506,14 @@ static int mlx5_query_port_roce(struct ib_device *device, u8 port_num,
/* Possible bad flows are checked before filling out props so in case
* of an error it will still be zeroed out.
+ * Use native port in case of reps
*/
- err = mlx5_query_port_ptys(mdev, out, sizeof(out), MLX5_PTYS_EN,
- mdev_port_num);
+ if (dev->is_rep)
+ err = mlx5_query_port_ptys(mdev, out, sizeof(out), MLX5_PTYS_EN,
+ 1);
+ else
+ err = mlx5_query_port_ptys(mdev, out, sizeof(out), MLX5_PTYS_EN,
+ mdev_port_num);
if (err)
goto out;
ext = MLX5_CAP_PCAM_FEATURE(dev->mdev, ptys_extended_ethernet);
@@ -1432,7 +1437,9 @@ static int mlx5_ib_rep_query_port(struct ib_device *ibdev, u8 port,
{
int ret;
- /* Only link layer == ethernet is valid for representors */
+ /* Only link layer == ethernet is valid for representors
+ * and we always use port 1
+ */
ret = mlx5_query_port_roce(ibdev, port, props);
if (ret || !props)
return ret;
@@ -4565,7 +4572,7 @@ static void get_ext_port_caps(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
mlx5_query_ext_port_caps(dev, port);
}
-static int get_port_caps(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u8 port)
+static int __get_port_caps(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u8 port)
{
struct ib_device_attr *dprops = NULL;
struct ib_port_attr *pprops = NULL;
@@ -4608,6 +4615,16 @@ static int get_port_caps(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u8 port)
return err;
}
+static int get_port_caps(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u8 port)
+{
+ /* For representors use port 1, is this is the only native
+ * port
+ */
+ if (dev->is_rep)
+ return __get_port_caps(dev, 1);
+ return __get_port_caps(dev, port);
+}
+
static void destroy_umrc_res(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
{
int err;
@@ -6268,6 +6285,7 @@ static int mlx5_ib_stage_common_roce_init(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
port_num = mlx5_core_native_port_num(dev->mdev) - 1;
+ /* Register only for native ports */
return mlx5_add_netdev_notifier(dev, port_num);
}
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
index 885f87d0a3f9..7daa20102b1d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
@@ -956,6 +956,7 @@ struct mlx5_ib_dev {
u16 devx_whitelist_uid;
struct mlx5_srq_table srq_table;
struct mlx5_async_ctx async_ctx;
+ int free_port;
};
static inline struct mlx5_ib_cq *to_mibcq(struct mlx5_core_cq *mcq)
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 13:27 [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] Move IB representors to single IB device multiple ports Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 01/12] net/mlx5: E-Switch, don't use hardcoded values for FDB prios Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 02/12] net/mlx5: E-Switch, add a new prio to be used by the RDMA side Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 03/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move netdev info into the port struct Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 04/12] RDMA/mlx5: Free IB device on remove Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 05/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move ports allocation to outside of INIT stage Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 06/12] RDMA/mlx5: Use correct size for device resources Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 07/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move rep into port struct Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 08/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move default representors SQ steering to rule to modify QP Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 09/12] RDMA/mlx5: Refactor netdev affinity code Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 10/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move SMI caps logic Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 12/12] RDMA/mlx5: Remove VF representor profile Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-04 13:02 ` [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] Move IB representors to single IB device multiple ports Jason Gunthorpe
2019-04-04 17:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-10 6:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-10 18:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190328132742.12070-12-leon@kernel.org \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maorg@mellanox.com \
--cc=markb@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.