From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E60EC43381 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E09A20882 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="UWmosBUX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731228AbfCaPdq (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Mar 2019 11:33:46 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:44612 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731118AbfCaPdq (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Mar 2019 11:33:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=a4afLyeMANW2oa/32VwAfquI1pGHC0jjsJX9201ar2I=; b=UWmosBUXzujJF0OGTCRI22xiAn xy1Mj/4RdjYUAEDthFKhSQauihDEUKA09qZpwC9ztPbQaTi5Mh9o3+s747FMrF0vRJmDGtaKP2oX9 6/0JJgMoXBnBS7/YENEVHWGJmmh2kmG0IQ/LGZg+OEMKvQy6b6po4bJpHIH/VwO1h2xM=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hAcSs-0006AV-5C; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 17:33:42 +0200 Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 17:33:42 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: Florian Fainelli , David Miller , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: improve genphy_read_status Message-ID: <20190331153342.GF20636@lunn.ch> References: <36da82de-6dad-939e-7604-d3c0b93f54c8@gmail.com> <20190331145241.GC20636@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 04:59:13PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 31.03.2019 16:52, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >> - if (AUTONEG_ENABLE == phydev->autoneg) { > >> + if (phydev->autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE && phydev->link) { > > > > Hi Heiner > > > > I don't necessary agree with placing the constant first in the > > comparison, but it is best practice not to change it when making > > additions. It makes it a little bit harder to see what the actual > > change was. > > > I understand the point. However a patch to only change the order > of the operands most likely would also be rejected as not being > worth it. As i said, i don't necessarily agree with the ordering, but i don't object to it. There are reasonable arguments which it is better. So i would just leave it alone. Andrew