From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
croce@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl.c: Fix out-of-bounds access when setting file-max
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:24:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190403172415.GD17500@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190403154044.qejdbl7i2ny37jef@brauner.io>
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 04:34:09PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Commit 32a5ad9c2285 ("sysctl: handle overflow for file-max") hooked
> > up min/max values for the file-max sysctl parameter via the .extra1
> > and .extra2 fields in the corresponding struct ctl_table entry.
> >
> > Unfortunately, the minimum value points at the global 'zero' variable,
> > which is an int. This results in a KASAN splat when accessed as a long
> > by proc_doulongvec_minmax on 64-bit architectures:
> >
> > | BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x5d8/0x6a0
> > | Read of size 8 at addr ffff2000133d1c20 by task systemd/1
> > |
> > | CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.1.0-rc3-00012-g40b114779944 #2
> > | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > | Call trace:
> > | dump_backtrace+0x0/0x228
> > | show_stack+0x14/0x20
> > | dump_stack+0xe8/0x124
> > | print_address_description+0x60/0x258
> > | kasan_report+0x140/0x1a0
> > | __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x18/0x20
> > | __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x5d8/0x6a0
> > | proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x4c/0x78
> > | proc_sys_call_handler.isra.19+0x144/0x1d8
> > | proc_sys_write+0x34/0x58
> > | __vfs_write+0x54/0xe8
> > | vfs_write+0x124/0x3c0
> > | ksys_write+0xbc/0x168
> > | __arm64_sys_write+0x68/0x98
> > | el0_svc_common+0x100/0x258
> > | el0_svc_handler+0x48/0xc0
> > | el0_svc+0x8/0xc
> > |
> > | The buggy address belongs to the variable:
> > | zero+0x0/0x40
> > |
> > | Memory state around the buggy address:
> > | ffff2000133d1b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa
> > | ffff2000133d1b80: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa
> > | >ffff2000133d1c00: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
> > | ^
> > | ffff2000133d1c80: fa fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
> > | ffff2000133d1d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >
> > Fix the splat by introducing a unsigned long 'zero_ul' and using that
> > instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 32a5ad9c2285 ("sysctl: handle overflow for file-max")
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> Hey Will, thanks! For the record, there's another patch by Matteo (Cced)
> for the same thing:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190328130306.25384-1-mcroce@redhat.com/
Oops, sorry, I didn't spot that. I just ran into this while I was using
KASAN to investigate a different issue and quickly sent out a fix.
> He's proposing a slightly different version for the fix. I don't care
> very much but I like that you've used the explicit unsigned long so:
>
> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
>
> Thanks to both of you for fixing this!
I'm also not bothered about which patch gets in, as long as the problem is
fixed. I assume somebody will pick up one of them...
Will
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-03 15:34 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl.c: Fix out-of-bounds access when setting file-max Will Deacon
2019-04-03 15:40 ` Christian Brauner
2019-04-03 17:24 ` Will Deacon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190403172415.GD17500@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=croce@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.