All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: idosch@mellanox.com, jiri@mellanox.com, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/18] ipv4: Refactor fib_check_nh
Date: Thu,  4 Apr 2019 10:49:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190404175007.8150-9-dsahern@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190404175007.8150-1-dsahern@kernel.org>

From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>

fib_check_nh is currently huge covering multiple uses cases - device only,
device + gateway, and device + gateway with ONLINK. The next patch adds
validation checks for IPv6 which only further complicates it. So, break
fib_check_nh into 2 helpers - one for gateway validation and one for device
only.

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
---
 net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
index 5e16a0127ddd..b9f0388a2c70 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
@@ -885,134 +885,150 @@ bool fib_metrics_match(struct fib_config *cfg, struct fib_info *fi)
  *					|
  *					|-> {local prefix} (terminal node)
  */
-static int fib_check_nh(struct fib_config *cfg, struct fib_nh *nh,
-			struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+static int fib_check_nh_v4_gw(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *nh, u32 table,
+			      u8 scope, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
-	int err = 0;
-	struct net *net;
 	struct net_device *dev;
+	struct fib_result res;
+	int err;
 
-	net = cfg->fc_nlinfo.nl_net;
-	if (nh->fib_nh_gw4) {
-		struct fib_result res;
-
-		if (nh->fib_nh_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK) {
-			unsigned int addr_type;
+	if (nh->fib_nh_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK) {
+		unsigned int addr_type;
 
-			if (cfg->fc_scope >= RT_SCOPE_LINK) {
-				NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
-					       "Nexthop has invalid scope");
-				return -EINVAL;
-			}
-			dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, nh->fib_nh_oif);
-			if (!dev) {
-				NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop device required for onlink");
-				return -ENODEV;
-			}
-			if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) {
-				NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
-					       "Nexthop device is not up");
-				return -ENETDOWN;
-			}
-			addr_type = inet_addr_type_dev_table(net, dev,
-							     nh->fib_nh_gw4);
-			if (addr_type != RTN_UNICAST) {
-				NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
-					       "Nexthop has invalid gateway");
-				return -EINVAL;
-			}
-			if (!netif_carrier_ok(dev))
-				nh->fib_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
-			nh->fib_nh_dev = dev;
-			dev_hold(dev);
-			nh->fib_nh_scope = RT_SCOPE_LINK;
-			return 0;
+		if (scope >= RT_SCOPE_LINK) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has invalid scope");
+			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		{
-			struct fib_table *tbl = NULL;
-			struct flowi4 fl4 = {
-				.daddr = nh->fib_nh_gw4,
-				.flowi4_scope = cfg->fc_scope + 1,
-				.flowi4_oif = nh->fib_nh_oif,
-				.flowi4_iif = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX,
-			};
-
-			/* It is not necessary, but requires a bit of thinking */
-			if (fl4.flowi4_scope < RT_SCOPE_LINK)
-				fl4.flowi4_scope = RT_SCOPE_LINK;
-
-			if (cfg->fc_table)
-				tbl = fib_get_table(net, cfg->fc_table);
-
-			if (tbl)
-				err = fib_table_lookup(tbl, &fl4, &res,
-						       FIB_LOOKUP_IGNORE_LINKSTATE |
-						       FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF);
-
-			/* on error or if no table given do full lookup. This
-			 * is needed for example when nexthops are in the local
-			 * table rather than the given table
-			 */
-			if (!tbl || err) {
-				err = fib_lookup(net, &fl4, &res,
-						 FIB_LOOKUP_IGNORE_LINKSTATE);
-			}
-
-			if (err) {
-				NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
-					       "Nexthop has invalid gateway");
-				rcu_read_unlock();
-				return err;
-			}
+		dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, nh->fib_nh_oif);
+		if (!dev) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop device required for onlink");
+			return -ENODEV;
 		}
-		err = -EINVAL;
-		if (res.type != RTN_UNICAST && res.type != RTN_LOCAL) {
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has invalid gateway");
-			goto out;
+		if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop device is not up");
+			return -ENETDOWN;
 		}
-		nh->fib_nh_scope = res.scope;
-		nh->fib_nh_oif = FIB_RES_OIF(res);
-		nh->fib_nh_dev = dev = FIB_RES_DEV(res);
-		if (!dev) {
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
-				       "No egress device for nexthop gateway");
-			goto out;
+		addr_type = inet_addr_type_dev_table(net, dev, nh->fib_nh_gw4);
+		if (addr_type != RTN_UNICAST) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has invalid gateway");
+			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		dev_hold(dev);
 		if (!netif_carrier_ok(dev))
 			nh->fib_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
-		err = (dev->flags & IFF_UP) ? 0 : -ENETDOWN;
-	} else {
-		struct in_device *in_dev;
-
-		if (nh->fib_nh_flags & (RTNH_F_PERVASIVE | RTNH_F_ONLINK)) {
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
-				       "Invalid flags for nexthop - PERVASIVE and ONLINK can not be set");
-			return -EINVAL;
+		nh->fib_nh_dev = dev;
+		dev_hold(dev);
+		nh->fib_nh_scope = RT_SCOPE_LINK;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	{
+		struct fib_table *tbl = NULL;
+		struct flowi4 fl4 = {
+			.daddr = nh->fib_nh_gw4,
+			.flowi4_scope = scope + 1,
+			.flowi4_oif = nh->fib_nh_oif,
+			.flowi4_iif = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX,
+		};
+
+		/* It is not necessary, but requires a bit of thinking */
+		if (fl4.flowi4_scope < RT_SCOPE_LINK)
+			fl4.flowi4_scope = RT_SCOPE_LINK;
+
+		if (table)
+			tbl = fib_get_table(net, table);
+
+		if (tbl)
+			err = fib_table_lookup(tbl, &fl4, &res,
+					       FIB_LOOKUP_IGNORE_LINKSTATE |
+					       FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF);
+
+		/* on error or if no table given do full lookup. This
+		 * is needed for example when nexthops are in the local
+		 * table rather than the given table
+		 */
+		if (!tbl || err) {
+			err = fib_lookup(net, &fl4, &res,
+					 FIB_LOOKUP_IGNORE_LINKSTATE);
 		}
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		err = -ENODEV;
-		in_dev = inetdev_by_index(net, nh->fib_nh_oif);
-		if (!in_dev)
-			goto out;
-		err = -ENETDOWN;
-		if (!(in_dev->dev->flags & IFF_UP)) {
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device for nexthop is not up");
+
+		if (err) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has invalid gateway");
 			goto out;
 		}
-		nh->fib_nh_dev = in_dev->dev;
-		dev_hold(nh->fib_nh_dev);
-		nh->fib_nh_scope = RT_SCOPE_HOST;
-		if (!netif_carrier_ok(nh->fib_nh_dev))
-			nh->fib_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
-		err = 0;
 	}
+
+	err = -EINVAL;
+	if (res.type != RTN_UNICAST && res.type != RTN_LOCAL) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has invalid gateway");
+		goto out;
+	}
+	nh->fib_nh_scope = res.scope;
+	nh->fib_nh_oif = FIB_RES_OIF(res);
+	nh->fib_nh_dev = dev = FIB_RES_DEV(res);
+	if (!dev) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+			       "No egress device for nexthop gateway");
+		goto out;
+	}
+	dev_hold(dev);
+	if (!netif_carrier_ok(dev))
+		nh->fib_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
+	err = (dev->flags & IFF_UP) ? 0 : -ENETDOWN;
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int fib_check_nh_nongw(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *nh,
+			      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct in_device *in_dev;
+	int err;
+
+	if (nh->fib_nh_flags & (RTNH_F_PERVASIVE | RTNH_F_ONLINK)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+			       "Invalid flags for nexthop - PERVASIVE and ONLINK can not be set");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	err = -ENODEV;
+	in_dev = inetdev_by_index(net, nh->fib_nh_oif);
+	if (!in_dev)
+		goto out;
+	err = -ENETDOWN;
+	if (!(in_dev->dev->flags & IFF_UP)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device for nexthop is not up");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	nh->fib_nh_dev = in_dev->dev;
+	dev_hold(nh->fib_nh_dev);
+	nh->fib_nh_scope = RT_SCOPE_HOST;
+	if (!netif_carrier_ok(nh->fib_nh_dev))
+		nh->fib_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
+	err = 0;
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int fib_check_nh(struct fib_config *cfg, struct fib_nh *nh,
+			struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct net *net = cfg->fc_nlinfo.nl_net;
+	u32 table = cfg->fc_table;
+	int err;
+
+	if (nh->fib_nh_gw_family == AF_INET)
+		err = fib_check_nh_v4_gw(net, nh, table, cfg->fc_scope, extack);
+	else
+		err = fib_check_nh_nongw(net, nh, extack);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static inline unsigned int fib_laddr_hashfn(__be32 val)
 {
 	unsigned int mask = (fib_info_hash_size - 1);
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-04 17:49 [PATCH net-next 00/18] ipv4: Enable support for IPv6 gateway with IPv4 routes David Ahern
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 01/18] ipv6: Add fib6_nh_init and release to stubs David Ahern
2019-04-05 12:46   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-05 14:49     ` David Ahern
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 02/18] ipv6: Add neighbor helpers that use the ipv6 stub David Ahern
2019-04-05 12:53   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 03/18] net: Replace nhc_has_gw with nhc_gw_family David Ahern
2019-04-05 13:04   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 04/18] ipv4: Prepare rtable for IPv6 gateway David Ahern
2019-04-05 13:13   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 05/18] ipv4: Prepare fib_config " David Ahern
2019-04-05 13:38   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 06/18] ipv4: Add support to rtable for ipv6 gateway David Ahern
2019-04-05 13:48   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 07/18] ipv4: Add support to fib_config for IPv6 gateway David Ahern
2019-04-05 14:00   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:49 ` David Ahern [this message]
2019-04-05 14:11   ` [PATCH net-next 08/18] ipv4: Refactor fib_check_nh Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 09/18] ipv4: Add fib_check_nh_v6_gw David Ahern
2019-04-05 14:18   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next 10/18] neighbor: Add skip_cache argument to neigh_output David Ahern
2019-04-04 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next 11/18] ipv4: Add helpers for neigh lookup for nexthop David Ahern
2019-04-05 14:48   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next 12/18] bpf: Handle ipv6 gateway in bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup David Ahern
2019-04-04 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next 13/18] ipv4: Handle ipv6 gateway in ipv4_confirm_neigh David Ahern
2019-04-04 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next 14/18] ipv4: Handle ipv6 gateway in fib_detect_death David Ahern
2019-04-04 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next 15/18] ipv4: Handle ipv6 gateway in fib_good_nh David Ahern
2019-04-04 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next 16/18] ipv4: Flag fib_info with a fib_nh using IPv6 gateway David Ahern
2019-04-05 14:54   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-04-04 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next 17/18] ipv4: Allow ipv6 gateway with ipv4 routes David Ahern
2019-04-04 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next 18/18] selftests: fib_tests: Add tests for ipv6 gateway with ipv4 route David Ahern
2019-04-05 15:56 ` [PATCH net-next 00/18] ipv4: Enable support for IPv6 gateway with IPv4 routes Ido Schimmel
2019-04-05 23:38   ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190404175007.8150-9-dsahern@kernel.org \
    --to=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.