Re: [PATCH v2] t5551: mark half-auth no-op fetch test as v0-only

[Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Jonathan Tan wrote:

> When using protocol v0, upload-pack over HTTP permits a "half-auth"
> configuration in which, at the web server layer, the info/refs path is
> not protected by authentication but the git-upload-pack path is, so that
> a user can perform fetches that do not download any objects without
> authentication, but still needs authentication to download objects.
>
> But protocol v2 does not support this, because both ref and pack are
> obtained from the git-upload-pack path.
>
> Mark the test verifying this behavior as protocol v0-only, with a
> description of what needs to be done to make v2 support this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>

Thanks for the analysis.  Makes sense.

> --- a/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh
> +++ b/t/t5551-http-fetch-smart.sh
> @@ -164,7 +164,17 @@ test_expect_success 'clone from auth-only-for-objects repository' '
>  
>  test_expect_success 'no-op half-auth fetch does not require a password' '
>  	set_askpass wrong &&
> -	git --git-dir=half-auth fetch &&
> +
> +	# NEEDSWORK: When using HTTP(S), protocol v0 supports a "half-auth"
> +	# configuration with authentication required only when downloading
> +	# objects and not refs, by having the HTTP server only require
> +	# authentication for the "git-upload-pack" path and not "info/refs".
> +	# This is not possible with protocol v2, since both objects and refs
> +	# are obtained from the "git-upload-pack" path. A solution to this is
> +	# to teach the server and client to be able to inline ls-refs requests
> +	# as an Extra Parameter (see pack-protocol.txt), so that "info/refs"
> +	# can serve refs, just like it does in protocol v0.
> +	GIT_TEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION=0 git --git-dir=half-auth fetch &&
>  	expect_askpass none

I suspect it's fine if protocol v2 never supports this.  Can we change
the NEEDSWORK comment to say that the protocol v2 spec should document
the lack of support for half-auth?

With or without such a change,
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

Thanks.