From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next] ravb: Avoid unsupported internal delay mode for R-Car E3/D3
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:12:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190408111252.GB4553@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408094823.24bbzfp63mhzdkaa@verge.net.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1055 bytes --]
^
> > > +static const struct soc_device_attribute ravb_delay_mode_quirk_match[] = {
> > > + { .soc_id = "r8a77990", .revision = "ES1.*" },
> > > + { .soc_id = "r8a77995", .revision = "ES1.*" },
> > > + { /* sentinel */ }
> > > +};
> >
> > I might have missed it but is there a plan to fix this in later
> > revisions of D3/E3? I was under the impression that it is not and then
> > we could base it on compatible rather than soc_device_match?
>
> I am not aware of any such plan (or the absence of such a plan).
>
> I was unsure weather to go with the compat approach of the quirk approach.
> In the end I went with the quirk approach as it seems simpler. But
> I'm happy to re-arrange things.
I see. Well, I don't care super much. The tiny drawback here is that we
will have a potentially broken D3/E3 ES2.0, if they have not fixed TXID
there. Then we need to update the above pattern. So, revision = "*" (or
the compatible approach) might be a tad better. Then we "only" have 1G
disabled for no reason until we whitelist it.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 8:29 [PATCH/RFC net-next] ravb: Avoid unsupported internal delay mode for R-Car E3/D3 Simon Horman
2019-04-08 9:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-08 9:48 ` Simon Horman
2019-04-08 11:12 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-04-08 13:02 ` Simon Horman
2019-04-08 13:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-08 17:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-04-08 17:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-04-09 10:45 ` Simon Horman
2019-04-09 15:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-04-10 9:37 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190408111252.GB4553@kunai \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.