diff for duplicates of <20190408152302.GE32498@localhost.localdomain> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 6cd3114..7134ee5 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 12:51:23AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: -> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 05:36:32PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: -> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 5:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote: +On Sun, Apr 07, 2019@12:51:23AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: +> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019@05:36:32PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: +> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019@5:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote: > > > Looking at current peak testing, I've got around 1.2% in queue enter > > > and exit. It's definitely not free, hence my question. Probably safe > > > to assume that we'll double that cycle counter, per IO. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 40cb269..cf71ca9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,25 +4,14 @@ "ref\0d4a4b6c0-3ea8-f748-85b0-6b39c5023a6f@kernel.dk\0" "ref\0CAOSXXT7V3E2j_Ut=hJ2X3QcdLwuWGRFtgzTs4iTe+RDMeHg8nA@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\020190407075123.GA22003@infradead.org\0" - "From\0Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx requests on CPU unplug\0" + "From\0kbusch@kernel.org (Keith Busch)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx requests on CPU unplug\0" "Date\0Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:23:02 -0600\0" - "To\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>\0" - "Cc\0Keith Busch <keith.busch@gmail.com>" - Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - Busch - Keith <keith.busch@intel.com> - Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> - linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org> - Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> - linux-block@vger.kernel.org <linux-block@vger.kernel.org> - Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> - " Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 12:51:23AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" - "> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 05:36:32PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:\n" - "> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 5:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:\n" + "On Sun, Apr 07, 2019@12:51:23AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" + "> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019@05:36:32PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:\n" + "> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019@5:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:\n" "> > > Looking at current peak testing, I've got around 1.2% in queue enter\n" "> > > and exit. It's definitely not free, hence my question. Probably safe\n" "> > > to assume that we'll double that cycle counter, per IO.\n" @@ -37,4 +26,4 @@ "I don't think that we can readily do that. We still need to protect a\n" request_queue access prior to selecting the hctx. -be48318e1e963df94ccf379c80bc8ccd7291cac8f5ba232bf6459c0b9bdeb97a +519dbfcb98f2c02b6234ef721d83ab5eb95bdb4916b0548db62d58fe7f7d9bd9
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.