From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rtc tree with the omap tree
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 07:22:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409142201.GC2839@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e3bc22e-97b5-3f63-c202-e04cfad48222@ti.com>
* Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> [190409 13:25]:
>
>
> On 09/04/19 10:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rtc tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 6256f7f7f217 ("rtc: OMAP: Add support for rtc-only mode")
> >
> > from the omap tree and commit:
> >
> > 35118b7a4ea0 ("rtc: omap: let the core handle range")
> >
> > from the rtc tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I used the latter resolution around tm2bcd() changes) and
> > can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> > is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
>
> Thanks Stephen. I have tested with Latest next and rtc+ddr mode is
> functional with an additional fix that Tony is about to queue.
>
> I also reviewed the rtc driver and looks fine.
Thanks, it's probably better to keep the merge conflict rather
than bring in all the rest of the rtc tree changes in this
case.
Regards,
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 5:22 linux-next: manual merge of the rtc tree with the omap tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-09 13:25 ` Keerthy
2019-04-09 14:22 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190409142201.GC2839@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.