From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC patch 26/41] mm/page_owner: Simplify stack trace handling
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:28:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410103645.951691679@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190410102754.387743324@linutronix.de
Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage
array based interfaces.
The original code in all printing functions is really wrong. It allocates a
storage array on stack which is unused because depot_fetch_stack() does not
store anything in it. It overwrites the entries pointer in the stack_trace
struct so it points to the depot storage.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/page_owner.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/page_owner.c
+++ b/mm/page_owner.c
@@ -58,15 +58,10 @@ static bool need_page_owner(void)
static __always_inline depot_stack_handle_t create_dummy_stack(void)
{
unsigned long entries[4];
- struct stack_trace dummy;
+ unsigned int nent;
- dummy.nr_entries = 0;
- dummy.max_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(entries);
- dummy.entries = &entries[0];
- dummy.skip = 0;
-
- save_stack_trace(&dummy);
- return depot_save_stack(&dummy, GFP_KERNEL);
+ nent = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 0);
+ return stack_depot_save(entries, nent, GFP_KERNEL);
}
static noinline void register_dummy_stack(void)
@@ -120,46 +115,39 @@ void __reset_page_owner(struct page *pag
}
}
-static inline bool check_recursive_alloc(struct stack_trace *trace,
- unsigned long ip)
+static inline bool check_recursive_alloc(unsigned long *entries,
+ unsigned int nr_entries,
+ unsigned long ip)
{
- int i;
+ unsigned int i;
- if (!trace->nr_entries)
- return false;
-
- for (i = 0; i < trace->nr_entries; i++) {
- if (trace->entries[i] == ip)
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++) {
+ if (entries[i] == ip)
return true;
}
-
return false;
}
static noinline depot_stack_handle_t save_stack(gfp_t flags)
{
unsigned long entries[PAGE_OWNER_STACK_DEPTH];
- struct stack_trace trace = {
- .nr_entries = 0,
- .entries = entries,
- .max_entries = PAGE_OWNER_STACK_DEPTH,
- .skip = 2
- };
depot_stack_handle_t handle;
+ unsigned int nent;
- save_stack_trace(&trace);
+ nent = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 2);
/*
- * We need to check recursion here because our request to stackdepot
- * could trigger memory allocation to save new entry. New memory
- * allocation would reach here and call depot_save_stack() again
- * if we don't catch it. There is still not enough memory in stackdepot
- * so it would try to allocate memory again and loop forever.
+ * We need to check recursion here because our request to
+ * stackdepot could trigger memory allocation to save new
+ * entry. New memory allocation would reach here and call
+ * stack_depot_save_entries() again if we don't catch it. There is
+ * still not enough memory in stackdepot so it would try to
+ * allocate memory again and loop forever.
*/
- if (check_recursive_alloc(&trace, _RET_IP_))
+ if (check_recursive_alloc(entries, nent, _RET_IP_))
return dummy_handle;
- handle = depot_save_stack(&trace, flags);
+ handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nent, flags);
if (!handle)
handle = failure_handle;
@@ -337,16 +325,10 @@ print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_
struct page *page, struct page_owner *page_owner,
depot_stack_handle_t handle)
{
- int ret;
- int pageblock_mt, page_mt;
+ int ret, pageblock_mt, page_mt;
+ unsigned long *entries;
+ unsigned int nent;
char *kbuf;
- unsigned long entries[PAGE_OWNER_STACK_DEPTH];
- struct stack_trace trace = {
- .nr_entries = 0,
- .entries = entries,
- .max_entries = PAGE_OWNER_STACK_DEPTH,
- .skip = 0
- };
count = min_t(size_t, count, PAGE_SIZE);
kbuf = kmalloc(count, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -375,8 +357,8 @@ print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_
if (ret >= count)
goto err;
- depot_fetch_stack(handle, &trace);
- ret += snprint_stack_trace(kbuf + ret, count - ret, &trace, 0);
+ nent = stack_depot_fetch(handle, &entries);
+ ret += stack_trace_snprint(kbuf + ret, count - ret, entries, nent, 0);
if (ret >= count)
goto err;
@@ -407,14 +389,9 @@ void __dump_page_owner(struct page *page
{
struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
struct page_owner *page_owner;
- unsigned long entries[PAGE_OWNER_STACK_DEPTH];
- struct stack_trace trace = {
- .nr_entries = 0,
- .entries = entries,
- .max_entries = PAGE_OWNER_STACK_DEPTH,
- .skip = 0
- };
depot_stack_handle_t handle;
+ unsigned long *entries;
+ unsigned int nent;
gfp_t gfp_mask;
int mt;
@@ -438,10 +415,10 @@ void __dump_page_owner(struct page *page
return;
}
- depot_fetch_stack(handle, &trace);
+ nent = stack_depot_fetch(handle, &entries);
pr_alert("page allocated via order %u, migratetype %s, gfp_mask %#x(%pGg)\n",
page_owner->order, migratetype_names[mt], gfp_mask, &gfp_mask);
- print_stack_trace(&trace, 0);
+ stack_trace_print(entries, nent, 0);
if (page_owner->last_migrate_reason != -1)
pr_alert("page has been migrated, last migrate reason: %s\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-10 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 10:27 [RFC patch 00/41] stacktrace: Avoid the pointless redirection through struct stack_trace Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 01/41] um/stacktrace: Remove the pointless ULONG_MAX marker Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:34 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 02/41] x86/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:34 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 03/41] arm/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:35 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 04/41] sh/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:36 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 05/41] unicore32/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:36 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 06/41] riscv/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:37 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 07/41] arm64/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:38 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 08/41] parisc/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:38 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 09/41] s390/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:39 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 10/41] lockdep: Remove the ULONG_MAX stack trace hackery Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:40 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 11/41] mm/slub: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:40 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 12/41] mm/page_owner: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:41 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 13/41] mm/kasan: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-04-14 20:42 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 14/41] latency_top: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:42 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 15/41] drm: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:43 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 16/41] tracing: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11 2:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11 3:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-14 20:44 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 17/41] tracing: Make stack_trace_print() static and rename it Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 0:19 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 18/41] stacktrace: Provide helpers for common stack trace operations Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 19/41] lib/stackdepot: Provide functions which operate on plain storage arrays Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 13:39 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 20/41] backtrace-test: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11 2:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 21/41] proc: Simplify task stack retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 14:49 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 22/41] latency_top: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 23/41] mm/slub: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 24/41] mm/kmemleak: Simplify stacktrace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 25/41] mm/kasan: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:33 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-04-11 2:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-14 16:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 17:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 27/41] fault-inject: Simplify stacktrace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 28/41] dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-10 11:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-10 12:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-10 12:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 3:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11 3:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11 3:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 3:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 29/41] btrfs: ref-verify: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:31 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 12:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:38 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 12:50 ` David Sterba
2019-04-10 13:47 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 30/41] dm bufio: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 31/41] dm persistent data: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 32/41] drm: Simplify stacktrace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 33/41] lockdep: Remove unused trace argument from print_circular_bug() Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 34/41] lockdep: Move stack trace logic into check_prev_add() Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 35/41] lockdep: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 36/41] tracing: Simplify stacktrace retrieval in histograms Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 37/41] tracing: Use percpu stack trace buffer more intelligently Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 38/41] tracing: Make ftrace_trace_userstack() static and conditional Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 39/41] tracing: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 40/41] stacktrace: Remove obsolete functions Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11 3:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-11 13:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 41/41] lib/stackdepot: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 13:49 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 11:49 ` [RFC patch 00/41] stacktrace: Avoid the pointless redirection through struct stack_trace Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190410103645.951691679@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.