From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, kernel-team@android.com,
keescook@chromium.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] module: Prepare for addition of new ro_after_init sections
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:11:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410191120.GA109588@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410190823.109172-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:08:21PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> For the purposes of hardening modules by adding sections to
> ro_after_init sections, prepare for addition of new ro_after_init
> entries which we do in future patches. Create a table to which new
> entries could be added later. This makes it less error prone and reduce
> code duplication.
>
> Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
> Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
> Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
> Cc: kernel-team@android.com
> Suggested-by: keescook@chromium.org
> Reviewed-by: keescook@chromium.org
> Acked-by: rostedt@goodmis.org
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>
> ---
> kernel/module.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index 524da609c884..1acddb93282a 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3300,11 +3300,27 @@ static bool blacklisted(const char *module_name)
> }
> core_param(module_blacklist, module_blacklist, charp, 0400);
>
> +/*
> + * Mark ro_after_init section with SHF_RO_AFTER_INIT so that
> + * layout_sections() can put it in the right place.
> + * Note: ro_after_init sections also have SHF_{WRITE,ALLOC} set.
> + */
> +static char *ro_after_init_sections[] = {
> + ".data..ro_after_init",
> +
> + /*
> + * __jump_table structures are never modified, with the exception of
> + * entries that refer to code in the __init section, which are
> + * annotated as such at module load time.
> + */
> + "__jump_table",
> +};
> +
> static struct module *layout_and_allocate(struct load_info *info, int flags)
> {
> struct module *mod;
> unsigned int ndx;
> - int err;
> + int err, i;
>
> err = check_modinfo(info->mod, info, flags);
> if (err)
> @@ -3319,23 +3335,12 @@ static struct module *layout_and_allocate(struct load_info *info, int flags)
> /* We will do a special allocation for per-cpu sections later. */
> info->sechdrs[info->index.pcpu].sh_flags &= ~(unsigned long)SHF_ALLOC;
>
> - /*
> - * Mark ro_after_init section with SHF_RO_AFTER_INIT so that
> - * layout_sections() can put it in the right place.
> - * Note: ro_after_init sections also have SHF_{WRITE,ALLOC} set.
> - */
> - ndx = find_sec(info, ".data..ro_after_init");
> - if (ndx)
> - info->sechdrs[ndx].sh_flags |= SHF_RO_AFTER_INIT;
> - /*
> - * Mark the __jump_table section as ro_after_init as well: these data
> - * structures are never modified, with the exception of entries that
> - * refer to code in the __init section, which are annotated as such
> - * at module load time.
> - */
> - ndx = find_sec(info, "__jump_table");
> - if (ndx)
> - info->sechdrs[ndx].sh_flags |= SHF_RO_AFTER_INIT;
> + /* Set sh_flags for read-only after init sections */
> + for (i = 0; ro_after_init_sections[i]; i++) {
Seems the fixup for this based on Kees suggestion of using NULL got squashed
into 2/3, so allow me to send a v3 to fix this ;-) Sorry! I am doing that
now.
The patches applied together are still code-correct thought.
thanks,
- Joel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-10 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 19:08 [PATCH v2 1/3] module: Prepare for addition of new ro_after_init sections Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-04-10 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] module: Make srcu_struct ptr array as read-only post init Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-04-10 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] module: Make __tracepoints_ptrs as read-only Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-04-10 19:11 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190410191120.GA109588@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.