From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC patch 28/41] dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:21:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20190411172130.GA30189@lst.de> References: <20190410102754.387743324@linutronix.de> <20190410103646.130022106@linutronix.de> <20190410110818.GA13904@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , LKML , Josh Poimboeuf , x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Steven Rostedt , Alexander Potapenko , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Robin Murphy , Marek Szyprowski List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:08:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:28:22PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace with an invocation of > > > the storage array based interface. > > > > This seems to be missing some context, at least stack_trace_save does > > not actually exist in mainline. > > > > Please always send the whole series out to everyone on the To and Cc > > list, otherwise patch series are not reviewable. > > Bah. People complain about overly broad cc-lists and the context is on > lkml. But sure, I just bounced it to you. People should stop complaining about that. Deleting a mail is a single keystroke. Finding all the patches to apply them and test, or even to review them is a nightmare. That is why depending on my mood I'll either complain like now when people do that crap, or if I feel bad enough just ignore them. If you don't give me the full context you can't expect me to have an informed opinion. Btw, the private forwarding is the worst of all worlds - now I have the patches, but can't sensibly reply to them.. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B54C10F14 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14A5920693 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:22:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 14A5920693 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE402A61; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED582A58 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:21:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23A1884 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C814268B02; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:21:30 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC patch 28/41] dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval Message-ID: <20190411172130.GA30189@lst.de> References: <20190410102754.387743324@linutronix.de> <20190410103646.130022106@linutronix.de> <20190410110818.GA13904@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: x86@kernel.org, LKML , Steven Rostedt , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alexander Potapenko , Andy Lutomirski , Josh Poimboeuf , Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Message-ID: <20190411172130.-mkgsFx8gSXcG_5CTzMV8f2CO53cZkAAAgHTMw-lH7U@z> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:08:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:28:22PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace with an invocation of > > > the storage array based interface. > > > > This seems to be missing some context, at least stack_trace_save does > > not actually exist in mainline. > > > > Please always send the whole series out to everyone on the To and Cc > > list, otherwise patch series are not reviewable. > > Bah. People complain about overly broad cc-lists and the context is on > lkml. But sure, I just bounced it to you. People should stop complaining about that. Deleting a mail is a single keystroke. Finding all the patches to apply them and test, or even to review them is a nightmare. That is why depending on my mood I'll either complain like now when people do that crap, or if I feel bad enough just ignore them. If you don't give me the full context you can't expect me to have an informed opinion. Btw, the private forwarding is the worst of all worlds - now I have the patches, but can't sensibly reply to them.. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu