Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:53:08 -0500 From: David Young To: radiotap-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [Radiotap] Query about recent Radiotap changes Message-ID: <20070326195308.GB11742-eZ+MEZF6i8Dc+919tysfdA@public.gmane.org> Mail-Followup-To: radiotap-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org References: <16B0F9F6-C3B2-4A00-A789-C1DD3E279D08-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> <20070326195045.GA11742-eZ+MEZF6i8Dc+919tysfdA@public.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070326195045.GA11742-eZ+MEZF6i8Dc+919tysfdA@public.gmane.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:50:45PM -0500, David Young wrote: > You could say these fields became part of the standard through the first > and last radiotap fields amnesty. I am not going to finish that sentence, apparently. Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyoung-eZodSLrBbDpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933