All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC 1/1] toolchain-external/Config.in: Allow to select custom external-toolchain package
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:57:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415085724.0528c3f7@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0ea00e5-8b75-807d-a1cd-245cd3bd080d@mind.be>

Hello,

On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 23:39:38 +0200
Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:

> > +config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_OTHER
> > +	bool "Other"
> > +	help
> > +	  Use this option to use a external toolchain from custom package
> > +	  (e.g. in external project).  
> 
>  So, the idea is to extend the choice with toolchains that come from
> BR2_EXTERNAL and that you can't select here, right? And you need something like
> that because it's a choice, and there's no way to extend the choice in a
> different Kconfig file.
> 
>  I think this is a worthwhile idea, so I'd like to work it out a little more...
> Adding Yann in Cc since he like that kind of external craziness :-)
> 
>  If kept like this, then I think you should make it depend on a new (blind)
> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_OTHER_AVAILABLE option, and that an external toolchain
> package should select that option. This way, the option is only available if
> your external tree actually makes one available.
> 
>  Also, it should be documented in docs/manual/customize-outside-br.txt.
> 
>  However, it's still pretty inconvenient for the user. So perhaps we could
> explicitly extend the external infra to generate a .br2-external.toolchain.in
> that is included from here. This file would be populated based on the file
> toolchain/Config.in in the external.
> 
>  Thomas, is that idea over-engineered?

It is over-engineered, but there is not much choice if we want to allow
implementing external toolchains in BR2_EXTERNAL, which would
definitely be useful.

The downside of Vadim's approach is that it limits the BR2_EXTERNAL to
implementing only one external toolchain, since it's only adding one
entry to the choice. Your approach would be more flexible.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-15  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-14 21:26 [Buildroot] [RFC 1/1] toolchain-external/Config.in: Allow to select custom external-toolchain package Vadim Kochan
2019-04-14 21:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-04-15  6:57   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-04-15  8:54     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-04-15 17:15       ` Yann E. MORIN
2019-04-16  6:01         ` Vadim Kochan
2019-04-16 20:11           ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190415085724.0528c3f7@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.