From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: lapic: Allow user to override auto-tuning of timer advancement
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:23:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415162348.GD24010@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E207F532-5EB9-4899-BE86-9F29A689713C@oracle.com>
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 02:35:39PM +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
>
>
> > On 12 Apr 2019, at 23:18, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Disable auto-tuning the timer advancement if the user specifies an
> > explicit value via the module param. Aside from the obvious override
> > capability, this also allows the KVM admin to set the advancement
> > beyond the internally-capped max of 5000ns.
> >
> > Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> > Fixes: 3b8a5df6c4dc6 ("KVM: LAPIC: Tune lapic_timer_advance_ns automatically")
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
>
> I agree we should allow admin the ability to disable the auto-tuning.
> However, I think we should keep the semantic of lapic_timer_advance_ns value.
> Whether this value is used as initial-value for auto-tuning or is auto-tuning
> disabled is a different knob for admin in my opinion. Therefore, I think we
> should just add another module parameter which basically set the initial
> value for apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done.
I waffled on whether to add a param or do the implicit override. I opted
for the implicit behavior primarily because I think most people would
expect that setting lapic_timer_advance_ns to some specific value would
fix the advancement at said value, as opposed to acting as a hint to the
autotuning logic. In other words, I again don't have a strong opinion :-)
> One could also wonder if it makes sense that whether auto-tuning will be
> enabled or not varies between VMs and should not be a global variable of KVM
> module?
I have no opinion on this one as I don't have any direct visibility into
how the auto-tuning will be used in real world deployments.
>
> -Liran
>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 2 ++
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 ++
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > index 70a0acd98e9e..c43cd26f040b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > @@ -2286,6 +2286,8 @@ int kvm_create_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 timer_advance_ns)
> > HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> > apic->lapic_timer.timer.function = apic_timer_fn;
> > apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns = timer_advance_ns;
> > + if (timer_advance_ns != LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_DEFAULT_NS)
> > + apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
> >
> > /*
> > * APIC is created enabled. This will prevent kvm_lapic_set_base from
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> > index 3e97f8a68967..c7233629c05b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
> > #define APIC_BUS_CYCLE_NS 1
> > #define APIC_BUS_FREQUENCY (1000000000ULL / APIC_BUS_CYCLE_NS)
> >
> > +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_DEFAULT_NS 1000
> > +
> > enum lapic_mode {
> > LAPIC_MODE_DISABLED = 0,
> > LAPIC_MODE_INVALID = X2APIC_ENABLE,
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index b303a21a2bc2..709a8bf5ae0e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static u32 __read_mostly tsc_tolerance_ppm = 250;
> > module_param(tsc_tolerance_ppm, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> >
> > /* lapic timer advance (tscdeadline mode only) in nanoseconds */
> > -static u32 __read_mostly lapic_timer_advance_ns = 1000;
> > +static u32 __read_mostly lapic_timer_advance_ns = LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_DEFAULT_NS;
> > module_param(lapic_timer_advance_ns, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> >
> > static bool __read_mostly vector_hashing = true;
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-15 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 20:18 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: lapic: Fix a variety of timer adv issues Sean Christopherson
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: lapic: Hard cap the auto-calculated timer advancement Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 10:22 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: lapic: Delay 1ns at a time when waiting for timer to "expire" Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 11:25 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15 16:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-15 17:06 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 11:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-16 11:04 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: lapic: Track lapic timer advance per vCPU Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 11:29 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: lapic: Allow user to override auto-tuning of timer advancement Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 11:35 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15 16:23 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-04-15 17:10 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: lapic: Busy wait for timer to expire when using hv_timer Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 11:47 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: lapic: Clean up the code for handling of a pre-expired hv_timer Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 12:15 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15 16:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-15 17:25 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-16 16:48 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-16 17:27 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 11:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: VMX: Skip delta_tsc shift-and-divide if the dividend is zero Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 12:21 ` Liran Alon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190415162348.GD24010@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.