From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip 0/2] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2 follow-up patches
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:02:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418080202.GA13653@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a9bbc09-2cd1-4f64-1d56-6b04e298902e@redhat.com>
* Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
> As the part2 patches are still being actively modified, it doesn't look
> like it will make the next merge window. I am fine with postponing it
> to 5.3. However, I would like to request the merging of just patch 1 of
> the part 2 patchset. It fixes a locking selftest problem that was
> introduced in the part 1 patches.
Sure, I've promoted this commit:
26536e7c242e: locking/rwsem: Prevent unneeded warning during locking selftest
from tip:WIP.locking/core into tip:locking/core, for a v5.2 merge.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-15 20:58 [PATCH-tip 0/2] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2 follow-up patches Waiman Long
2019-04-15 20:58 ` [PATCH-tip 1/2] locking/rwsem: Clarify usage of owner's nonspinaable bit Waiman Long
2019-04-15 20:58 ` [PATCH-tip 2/2] locking/rwsem: Adaptive disabling of reader optimistic spinning Waiman Long
2019-04-16 13:10 ` [PATCH-tip 0/2] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2 follow-up patches Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-16 13:18 ` Waiman Long
2019-04-16 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-16 17:03 ` Waiman Long
2019-04-16 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-16 19:49 ` Waiman Long
2019-04-17 5:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-17 20:30 ` Waiman Long
2019-04-18 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-04-18 12:42 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190418080202.GA13653@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.