All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Consider LAPIC TSC-Deadline timer expired if deadline too short
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 14:13:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190422211351.GJ1236@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190416173634.31501-1-liran.alon@oracle.com>

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 08:36:34PM +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
> If guest sets MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE to value such that in host
> time-domain it's shorter than lapic_timer_advance_ns, we can
> reach a case that we call hrtimer_start() with expiration time set at
> the past.
> 
> Because lapic_timer.timer is init with HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED, it
> is not allowed to run in softirq and therefore will never expire.
> 
> To avoid such a scenario, verify that deadline expiration time is set on
> host time-domain further than (now + lapic_timer_advance_ns).
> 
> A future patch can also consider adding a min_timer_deadline_ns module parameter,
> similar to min_timer_period_us to avoid races that amount of ns it takes
> to run logic could still call hrtimer_start() with expiration timer set
> at the past.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 9f089e2e09d0..fbd37e07e90d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1538,9 +1538,12 @@ static void start_sw_tscdeadline(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
>  
>  	now = ktime_get();
>  	guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
> -	if (likely(tscdeadline > guest_tsc)) {
> -		ns = (tscdeadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL;
> -		do_div(ns, this_tsc_khz);
> +
> +	ns = (tscdeadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL;
> +	do_div(ns, this_tsc_khz);

This will do the division even if 'tscdeadline <= guest_tsc'.  I don't
see any reason to use ktime_sub_ns() since neither 'ns' or
'lapic_timer_advance_ns' is a ktime_t, e.g.:

	if (likely(tscdeadline > guest_tsc)) {
		ns = (tscdeadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL;
		do_div(ns, this_tsc_khz);
		if (likely(ns > lapic_timer_advance_ns))
			ns -= lapic_timer_advance_ns;
		else
			ns = 0;
	} else {
		ns = 0;
	}
	if (ns) {
		now = ktime_get();
		expire = ktime_add_ns(now, ns);
		hrtimer_start(&apic->lapic_timer.timer,
				expire, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
	} else
		apic_timer_expired(apic);

> +
> +	if (likely(tscdeadline > guest_tsc) &&
> +	    likely(ns > lapic_timer_advance_ns)) {
>  		expire = ktime_add_ns(now, ns);
>  		expire = ktime_sub_ns(expire, lapic_timer_advance_ns);
>  		hrtimer_start(&apic->lapic_timer.timer,
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-22 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-16 17:36 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Consider LAPIC TSC-Deadline timer expired if deadline too short Liran Alon
2019-04-22 21:13 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-04-22 22:54   ` Liran Alon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190422211351.GJ1236@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.