From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Access console drivers list under console_sem
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:43:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424054305.GA28894@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423094801.377b8059@gandalf.local.home>
On (04/23/19 09:48), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > RFC
> >
> > Normally, we grab console_sem lock before we iterate consoles
> > list, which is necessary if we want to be race free. The only exception
> > to this rule is console_flush_on_panic(). However, it seems that we are
> > not fully race free - register_console() iterates console drivers list
> > in unsafe manner in several places. E.g. the following scenarion:
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > register_console() unregister_console()
> > console_lock()
> > for_each_console() // modify console_drivers
> > con->foo kfree(con)
> >
> > So I have two quick-n-dirty patches, which remove unsafe console list
> > access.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I just skimmed the patches and haven't done a thorough review, but the
> concept seems sane to me.
Thank you Steven. Let me know if anything doesn't work for you.
I have vague memories of a kernel Oops at con->foo dereferencing
(saw a message on linux-rt-users list a while ago, if I'm not
mistaken). And it seems that we have some races in printk code.
-ss
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-23 6:25 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Access console drivers list under console_sem Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-23 6:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] printk: lock console_sem before we unregister boot consoles Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-24 14:49 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-25 3:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25 6:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25 9:20 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-25 16:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-25 7:50 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-25 7:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25 9:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-23 6:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] printk: take console_sem when accessing console drivers list Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-24 15:13 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-25 5:19 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25 6:47 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25 8:53 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-23 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Access console drivers list under console_sem Steven Rostedt
2019-04-24 5:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424054305.GA28894@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.