All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] l2tp: use rcu_dereference_sk_user_data() in l2tp_udp_encap_recv()
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:58:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424095809.GA17274@pc-2.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423164326.108651-1-edumazet@google.com>

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 09:43:26AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Canonical way to fetch sk_user_data from an encap_rcv() handler called
> from UDP stack in rcu protected section is to use rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(),
> otherwise compiler might read it multiple times.
> 
That reminds me the more general problem we have with ->sk_user_data:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20180117.142538.1972806008716856078.davem@davemloft.net/

We're not even guarateed that ->sk_user_data points to a struct l2tp_tunnel
(some external modules can still probably override it).

There were some locking rules defined for setting ->sk_user_data:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20180124203541.3172-3-tom@quantonium.net/
Converting all users to either avoid using ->sk_user_data or using it
under the proper pre-conditions has been on my TODO list for a while...
I'll try to revive this effort.

> Fixes: d00fa9adc528 ("il2tp: fix races with tunnel socket close")
                        ^
Spurious "i". Vi user? :)

> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
> ---
>  net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> index fed6becc5daf86afa2ad9188bb28e151244bb5a6..aee33d1320184e411dbedff72b5bf5199481e53f 100644
> --- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> +++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> @@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ int l2tp_udp_encap_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>  	struct l2tp_tunnel *tunnel;
>  
> -	tunnel = l2tp_tunnel(sk);
> +	tunnel = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
>  	if (tunnel == NULL)
>  		goto pass_up;
>  
> -- 
> 2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-24  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-23 16:43 [PATCH net] l2tp: use rcu_dereference_sk_user_data() in l2tp_udp_encap_recv() Eric Dumazet
2019-04-24  9:58 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2019-04-24 11:33   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-04-24 18:21     ` Guillaume Nault
2019-04-24 18:29       ` Eric Dumazet
2019-04-24 19:04         ` Guillaume Nault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190424095809.GA17274@pc-2.home \
    --to=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.