From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] scsi: core: avoid to pre-allocate big chunk for protection meta data
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:37:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424143704.GC21209@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190424093540.15526-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>
> - if (scsi_prot_sg_count(cmd))
> - sg_free_table_chained(&cmd->prot_sdb->table, true);
> + if (scsi_prot_sg_count(cmd) && cmd->prot_sdb->table.sgl !=
> + scsi_prot_inline_sg(cmd))
> + sg_free_table_chained(&cmd->prot_sdb->table, false);
Nipick: I usually find it easier to read if we break around conditions
instead of inside them:
if (scsi_prot_sg_count(cmd) &&
cmd->prot_sdb->table.sgl != scsi_prot_inline_sg(cmd))
> + if (ivecs <= SCSI_INLINE_PROT_SG_CNT) {
> + scsi_init_inline_sg_table(&prot_sdb->table,
> + scsi_prot_inline_sg(cmd),
> + SCSI_INLINE_PROT_SG_CNT);
> + } else if (sg_alloc_table_chained(&prot_sdb->table,
> + ivecs, NULL)) {
Hmm. Maybe we just need to pass an nr_inline_vecs argument
to sg_alloc_table_chained to replace the SG_CHUNK_SIZE argument instead
of open coding this logic?
If we'd also pass it to sg_free_table_chained we could also simplify
those checks in all callers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-24 9:35 [PATCH V2 0/2] scis: core: avoid big pre-allocation for sg list Ming Lei
2019-04-24 9:35 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] scsi: core: avoid to pre-allocate big chunk for protection meta data Ming Lei
2019-04-24 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-04-25 9:37 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25 11:20 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 9:35 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] scsi: core: avoid to pre-allocate big chunk for sg list Ming Lei
2019-04-24 14:33 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] scis: core: avoid big pre-allocation " Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424143704.GC21209@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.