From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>,
"linux-wimax@intel.com David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] wimax/i2400m/control: Mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:20:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424162016.GA8393@embeddedor> (raw)
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
In file included from drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/debug-levels.h:30,
from drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c:86:
drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c: In function ‘i2400m_report_tlv_system_state’:
./include/linux/wimax/debug.h:200:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
do { \
^
./include/linux/wimax/debug.h:404:36: note: in expansion of macro ‘_d_printf’
#define d_printf(l, _dev, f, a...) _d_printf(l, "", _dev, f, ## a)
^~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c:354:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘d_printf’
d_printf(1, dev, "entering BS-negotiated idle mode\n");
^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c:355:2: note: here
case I2400M_SS_DISCONNECTING:
^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
index ef298d8525c5..4fe7c7e132c4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
@@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ void i2400m_report_tlv_system_state(struct i2400m *i2400m,
case I2400M_SS_IDLE:
d_printf(1, dev, "entering BS-negotiated idle mode\n");
+ /* Fall through */
case I2400M_SS_DISCONNECTING:
case I2400M_SS_DATA_PATH_CONNECTED:
wimax_state_change(wimax_dev, WIMAX_ST_CONNECTED);
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-24 16:20 Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2019-04-26 15:29 ` [PATCH net-next] wimax/i2400m/control: Mark expected switch fall-through David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424162016.GA8393@embeddedor \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.