From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Sender: Ingo Molnar Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:22:10 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/24] x86: text_poke() fixes and executable lockdowns Message-ID: <20190427102210.GA130188@gmail.com> References: <20190426232303.28381-1-nadav.amit@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190426232303.28381-1-nadav.amit@gmail.com> To: nadav.amit@gmail.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, Thomas Gleixner , Dave Hansen , linux_dti@icloud.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, will.deacon@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, kristen@linux.intel.com, deneen.t.dock@intel.com, Rick Edgecombe , Nadav Amit List-ID: * nadav.amit@gmail.com wrote: > From: Nadav Amit > > * > * This version fixes failed boots on 32-bit that were reported by 0day. > * Patch 5 is added to initialize uprobes during fork initialization. > * Patch 7 (which was 6 in the previous version) is updated - the code is > * moved to common mm-init code with no further changes. > * > > This patchset improves several overlapping issues around stale TLB > entries and W^X violations. It is combined from "x86/alternative: > text_poke() enhancements v7" [1] and "Don't leave executable TLB entries > to freed pages v2" [2] patchsets that were conflicting. Which tree is this again? It doesn't apply to Linus's latest nor to -tip cleanly. Thanks, Ingo