From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] soundwire updates for v5.2-rc1 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:12:15 +0530 Message-ID: <20190430084203.GR3845@vkoul-mobl.Dlink> References: <20190429112829.GH3845@vkoul-mobl.Dlink> <20190429114337.GA16771@kroah.com> <20190429114617.GJ3845@vkoul-mobl.Dlink> <24c3eef6-2a91-afbd-04f1-2e9a0db29f1c@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A02CF8065C for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:17:21 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <24c3eef6-2a91-afbd-04f1-2e9a0db29f1c@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: Greg KH , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 29-04-19, 07:53, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 4/29/19 6:46 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 29-04-19, 13:43, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:58:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > Hey Greg, > > > > > > > > Please PULL to receive updates to soundwire subsystem > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit bfeffd155283772bbe78c6a05dec7c0128ee500c: > > > > > > > > Linux 5.0-rc1 (2019-01-06 17:08:20 -0800) > > > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/soundwire.git tags/soundwire-5.2-rc1 > > > > > > Pulled and pushed out, thanks, > > > > That was fast :) > > Vinod, is there any reason why you didn't take the rest of my clean-up > patches? The feedback you provided wasn't really relevant (patches do apply > and alignment is fine) and you didn't reply to my questions. Sorry I though base don comments a v2 was coming, I will recheck and see if there is anything pending from my side. Nevertheless whats gets into a PULL request is frozen some days back, even if I had applied afterwards chances are that it wont have gone into this one. But hey there is always next one... > That's not > 'fast'. If we start having such delays with trivial patches, I can only > imagine how well this is going to work with the rest of the patches I am > cooking... I never claim to be as fast as Greg :) But delays will be there, without seeing rest of the patches I cant comment. But yes you can make it easy for people to review which ensures they get done faster Anyway lets discuss those points in relevant threads. Thanks -- ~Vinod