From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-dev-return-5715-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis.ws5.connectedcommunity.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F8E987BC8 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 18:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:41:14 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20190430183950-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <2f0de388-de01-1e51-b6b6-339389a2268a@solarflare.com> <20190211021124-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] RFC: Doorbell suppression, packed-ring mode and hardware offload To: David Riddoch Cc: Virtio-Dev List-ID: On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:52:01AM +0000, David Riddoch wrote: > > > Presumably we would like this to be an optional feature, as implement= ations > > > of packed mode already exist in the wild.=A0 How about > > > VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED_AVAIL_IDX? > > > If I prepare a patch to the spec is there still time to get this into= v1.1? > > Any new feature would require another round of public review. > > I personally think it's better to instead try to do 1.2 soon after, > > e.g. we could try to target quarterly releases. > >=20 > > But ultimately that would be up to the TC vote. Hi David! Now that 1.1 is out, how about proposing this for 1.2? It's probably a very good time for such a proposal. Do you have the time to spec it out? --=20 MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org