Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: mfd: LMU: Add the ramp up/down property

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1580 bytes --]

On Tue 2019-04-30 14:17:25, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Document the ramp-up and ramp-down property in the binding.
> Removing the "sec" from the property definition as seconds is
> implied.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
> ---
> 
> v3 - No changes added Reviewed-by Rob - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1058759/
> 
> v2 - Fixed commit message as this was not just a modification but adding documentation
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1054504/
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt        | 20 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt
> index 86ca786d54fc..adae96c79d39 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt
> @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ Required properties:
>  
>  Optional property:

"properties".

>    - enable-gpios: A GPIO specifier for hardware enable pin.
> +  - ramp-up-ms: Current ramping from one brightness level to
> +		the a higher brightness level.
> +		Range from 2048 us - 117.44 s
> +  - ramp-down-ms: Current ramping from one brightness level to
> +		  the a lower brightness level.
> +		  Range from 2048 us - 117.44 s

Can you use ramp-up/down-us for consistency?
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]