All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Dylan Howey <Dylan.Howey@tennantco.com>
Cc: "a.zummo@towertech.it" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port rtc-pcf2123 to regmap
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 22:55:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502205516.GD22550@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190502174518.GA12323@tennantco.com>

On 02/05/2019 17:45:24+0000, Dylan Howey wrote:
> As I'm working on this I've run across some other issues:
> 
> * Driver does not do a software reset on init. Datasheet recommends doing
>   this as this will clear any interrupts and alarm flags. The fix would
>   presumably be to add a call to pcf2123_reset in the init, but...
> 

It recommends doing a software reset after power-on in that case, it
refers to the power-on of the RTC, not the platform. You shouldn't do a
software reset as this will break time keeping, the offset and reading
alarms that may have been starting the platform.

> * pcf2123_reset stops the RTC for no apparent reason. Result is that the
>   time is invalid after a call to pcf2123_reset, which requires the time
>   to be set again manually. The fix would be to delete the stop commands.
> 

Using the software reset will render the time invalid anyway as this
will set the OS bit in the seconds register (see Table 7.
Register reset values).

> * I don't think pcf2123_read_offset is working correctly. In the case of
>   a coarse offset the value is not being sign extended. So a negative
>   offset read will not be correct if the coarse bit is set (result would
>   be a positive number being returned if this is true). I need to look
>   into this some more. The fix would be to sign extend first, then if
>   coarse bit is set multiply the result by 2.
> 

As the comment says, it is properly extended because after shifting,
bits [6:0] become bit [7:1].

> Not sure if I'll fix these issues right now. Also this RTC does have the 
> ability to do periodic interrupts but the feature has not been implemented
> in this driver. So I'll leave uie_unsupported set for now.
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-02 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-26 19:37 [PATCH 1/2] Port rtc-pcf2123 to regmap Howey, Dylan
2019-04-26 19:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add alarm support to rtc-pcf2123 Howey, Dylan
2019-04-27 13:11   ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-27 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] Port rtc-pcf2123 to regmap Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-29 15:09   ` Howey, Dylan
2019-04-30  9:22     ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-02 17:45       ` Dylan Howey
2019-05-02 20:55         ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2019-05-03 13:30           ` Dylan Howey
2019-06-19 13:16             ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190502205516.GD22550@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Dylan.Howey@tennantco.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.