[PATCH net-next] ipmr: Do not define MAXVIFS twice

[David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>]

From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>

b70432f7319eb refactored mroute code to make it common between ipv4
and ipv6. In the process, MAXVIFS got defined a second time: the
first is in the uapi file linux/mroute.h. A second one was created
presumably for IPv6 but it is not needed. Remove it and have
mroute_base.h include the uapi file directly since it is shared.

include/linux/mroute.h can not be included in mroute_base.h because
it contains a reference to mr_mfc which is defined in mroute_base.h.

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/mroute_base.h | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mroute_base.h b/include/linux/mroute_base.h
index 34de06b426ef..c5a389f81e91 100644
--- a/include/linux/mroute_base.h
+++ b/include/linux/mroute_base.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
 #include <linux/rhashtable-types.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/mroute.h>
 #include <net/net_namespace.h>
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/fib_notifier.h>
@@ -90,13 +91,6 @@ static inline int mr_call_vif_notifiers(struct net *net,
 	return call_fib_notifiers(net, event_type, &info.info);
 }
 
-#ifndef MAXVIFS
-/* This one is nasty; value is defined in uapi using different symbols for
- * mroute and morute6 but both map into same 32.
- */
-#define MAXVIFS	32
-#endif
-
 #define VIF_EXISTS(_mrt, _idx) (!!((_mrt)->vif_table[_idx].dev))
 
 /* mfc_flags:
-- 
2.11.0