From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: puranjay12 at gmail.com (Puranjay Mohan) Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 13:22:04 +0530 Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] Staging: rtl8192u: ieee80211: Fix comment formating errors In-Reply-To: <20190502174154.GB14304@kroah.com> References: <20190502052608.GA15578@arch> <20190502174154.GB14304@kroah.com> Message-ID: <20190503075204.GB4313@arch> List-Id: On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 07:41:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:56:08AM +0530, Puranjay Mohan wrote: > > Fix comment formating warnings found by checkpatch.pl > > > > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan > > --- > > .../rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c | 66 ++++++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c > > index 944c8894f9ff..be02f73f5618 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c > > @@ -196,13 +196,13 @@ static u8 MgntQuery_MgntFrameTxRate(struct ieee80211_device *ieee) > > } > > > > /* > > - // Data rate of ProbeReq is already decided. Annie, 2005-03-31 > > - if( pMgntInfo->bScanInProgress || (pMgntInfo->bDualModeScanStep!=0) ) { > > - if(pMgntInfo->dot11CurrentWirelessMode==WIRELESS_MODE_A) > > - rate = 0x0c; > > - else > > - rate = 0x02; > > - } > > + * // Data rate of ProbeReq is already decided. Annie, 2005-03-31 > > + * if( pMgntInfo->bScanInProgress || (pMgntInfo->bDualModeScanStep!=0) ) { > > + * if(pMgntInfo->dot11CurrentWirelessMode==WIRELESS_MODE_A) > > + * rate = 0x0c; > > + * else > > + * rate = 0x02; > > + * } > > */ > > return rate; > > Ick, no, just delete this chunk, that indentation makes no sense. This solves this checkpatch.pl warning WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines > > > } > > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ inline void softmac_mgmt_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_device *ieee > > /* insert the skb packet to the management queue */ > > /* as for the completion function, it does not need > > * to check it any more. > > - * */ > > + */ > > printk("%s():insert to waitqueue!\n", __func__); > > skb_queue_tail(&ieee->skb_waitQ[tcb_desc->queue_index], skb); > > } else { > > @@ -1643,11 +1643,11 @@ static short ieee80211_sta_ps_sleep(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u32 *time_h, > > int timeout; > > u8 dtim; > > /*if(ieee->ps == IEEE80211_PS_DISABLED || > > - ieee->iw_mode != IW_MODE_INFRA || > > - ieee->state != IEEE80211_LINKED) > > - > > - return 0; > > - */ > > + * ieee->iw_mode != IW_MODE_INFRA || > > + * ieee->state != IEEE80211_LINKED) > > + * > > + * return 0; > > + */ > > Same here. This also solves WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines > You also added trailing whitespace :( sorry, I will fix it in V2 > > dtim = ieee->current_network.dtim_data; > > if (!(dtim & IEEE80211_DTIM_VALID)) > > return 0; > > @@ -1979,8 +1979,8 @@ ieee80211_rx_frame_softmac(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb, > > case IEEE80211_STYPE_DISASSOC: > > case IEEE80211_STYPE_DEAUTH: > > /* FIXME for now repeat all the association procedure > > - * both for disassociation and deauthentication > > - */ > > + * both for disassociation and deauthentication > > + */ > > if ((ieee->softmac_features & IEEE_SOFTMAC_ASSOCIATE) && > > ieee->state == IEEE80211_LINKED && > > ieee->iw_mode == IW_MODE_INFRA) { > > @@ -2050,10 +2050,10 @@ void ieee80211_softmac_xmit(struct ieee80211_txb *txb, struct ieee80211_device * > > #endif > > (!ieee->check_nic_enough_desc(ieee->dev, queue_index)) || \ > > (ieee->queue_stop)) { > > - /* insert the skb packet to the wait queue */ > > - /* as for the completion function, it does not need > > + /* insert the skb packet to the wait queue > > > You added trailing whitespace :( > > I recommend fixing your editor to highlight in red when this happens. > > I stopped reviewing here... > > thanks, > > greg k-h I have fixed all trailing whitespace issues, also fixed my editor to show them :D. Should I keep the above two blocks(which you told to remove) in V2 because they solve WARNING:Block comments use * on subsequent lines, or should I remove them before sending V2. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: puranjay12@gmail.com (Puranjay Mohan) Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 13:22:04 +0530 Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] Staging: rtl8192u: ieee80211: Fix comment formating errors In-Reply-To: <20190502174154.GB14304@kroah.com> References: <20190502052608.GA15578@arch> <20190502174154.GB14304@kroah.com> Message-ID: <20190503075204.GB4313@arch> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20190503075204.TWrA5wZW_unLxXYiOV1d2XhXZ4sZR2_NPkv3u5sOVEo@z> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 07:41:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:56:08AM +0530, Puranjay Mohan wrote: > > Fix comment formating warnings found by checkpatch.pl > > > > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan > > --- > > .../rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c | 66 ++++++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c > > index 944c8894f9ff..be02f73f5618 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c > > @@ -196,13 +196,13 @@ static u8 MgntQuery_MgntFrameTxRate(struct ieee80211_device *ieee) > > } > > > > /* > > - // Data rate of ProbeReq is already decided. Annie, 2005-03-31 > > - if( pMgntInfo->bScanInProgress || (pMgntInfo->bDualModeScanStep!=0) ) { > > - if(pMgntInfo->dot11CurrentWirelessMode==WIRELESS_MODE_A) > > - rate = 0x0c; > > - else > > - rate = 0x02; > > - } > > + * // Data rate of ProbeReq is already decided. Annie, 2005-03-31 > > + * if( pMgntInfo->bScanInProgress || (pMgntInfo->bDualModeScanStep!=0) ) { > > + * if(pMgntInfo->dot11CurrentWirelessMode==WIRELESS_MODE_A) > > + * rate = 0x0c; > > + * else > > + * rate = 0x02; > > + * } > > */ > > return rate; > > Ick, no, just delete this chunk, that indentation makes no sense. This solves this checkpatch.pl warning WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines > > > } > > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ inline void softmac_mgmt_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_device *ieee > > /* insert the skb packet to the management queue */ > > /* as for the completion function, it does not need > > * to check it any more. > > - * */ > > + */ > > printk("%s():insert to waitqueue!\n", __func__); > > skb_queue_tail(&ieee->skb_waitQ[tcb_desc->queue_index], skb); > > } else { > > @@ -1643,11 +1643,11 @@ static short ieee80211_sta_ps_sleep(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u32 *time_h, > > int timeout; > > u8 dtim; > > /*if(ieee->ps == IEEE80211_PS_DISABLED || > > - ieee->iw_mode != IW_MODE_INFRA || > > - ieee->state != IEEE80211_LINKED) > > - > > - return 0; > > - */ > > + * ieee->iw_mode != IW_MODE_INFRA || > > + * ieee->state != IEEE80211_LINKED) > > + * > > + * return 0; > > + */ > > Same here. This also solves WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines > You also added trailing whitespace :( sorry, I will fix it in V2 > > dtim = ieee->current_network.dtim_data; > > if (!(dtim & IEEE80211_DTIM_VALID)) > > return 0; > > @@ -1979,8 +1979,8 @@ ieee80211_rx_frame_softmac(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb, > > case IEEE80211_STYPE_DISASSOC: > > case IEEE80211_STYPE_DEAUTH: > > /* FIXME for now repeat all the association procedure > > - * both for disassociation and deauthentication > > - */ > > + * both for disassociation and deauthentication > > + */ > > if ((ieee->softmac_features & IEEE_SOFTMAC_ASSOCIATE) && > > ieee->state == IEEE80211_LINKED && > > ieee->iw_mode == IW_MODE_INFRA) { > > @@ -2050,10 +2050,10 @@ void ieee80211_softmac_xmit(struct ieee80211_txb *txb, struct ieee80211_device * > > #endif > > (!ieee->check_nic_enough_desc(ieee->dev, queue_index)) || \ > > (ieee->queue_stop)) { > > - /* insert the skb packet to the wait queue */ > > - /* as for the completion function, it does not need > > + /* insert the skb packet to the wait queue > > > You added trailing whitespace :( > > I recommend fixing your editor to highlight in red when this happens. > > I stopped reviewing here... > > thanks, > > greg k-h I have fixed all trailing whitespace issues, also fixed my editor to show them :D. Should I keep the above two blocks(which you told to remove) in V2 because they solve WARNING:Block comments use * on subsequent lines, or should I remove them before sending V2.