All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 10:20:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506142010.GC2649@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAS=D96B_OgnRu-NK0-G+y8itvhe3qvwfYxZUCSqdC0gEA@mail.gmail.com>

[Re: Fwd: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree] On 06/05/2019 (Mon 21:07) Masahiro Yamada wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:34 PM Paul Gortmaker
> <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> >
> > [Fwd: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree] On 06/05/2019 (Mon 11:19) Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > In today's linux-next build testing,
> > > more "make ... explicitly non-modular"
> > > candidates showed up.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > I am not 100% clear on what you are asking me.  There are lots and lots
> > of these in the kernel.... many fixed, and many remain unfortunately.
> >
> > > arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> > > drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
> > > drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> > > drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c
> >
> > None of these are "new".  I just checked, and I have had patches for all
> > these for a long time, in my personal queue, found by my audits.
> 
> 
> OK, I saw many patches from you
> addressing this issue,
> so I just thought you might be motivated to
> fix them.
> 
> Anyway, I have a reason to fix them
> because a patch in my tree is causing build errors.

I understand now.  I missed the connection between these drivers and the
Kbuild change when I read this last night.  Sorry about that.

I can send the changes to those four files, but since I can't guarantee
they will be merged quickly (or at all!) - that will leave the commit in
the Kbuild tree causing build regressions for days or likely even weeks.

> So, I will do something for them
> if you do not have a plan to send patches soon.

I will be happy to send them, but we just opened the two week merge
window, and a lot of maintainers don't like getting sent new patches
until the two week merge window has closed - so we should avoid that.

I'm not sure how you would like to proceed - one way would be that we
get the drivers above changed in 5.2 and you delay your kbuild change
until we start v5.3 - to that end I'd be happy to add the Kbuild change
to my internal build testing in the meantime, if you would like.

Now that I understand the problem, let me know what you would like to
do, and I'll do what I can to help out.

Thanks,
Paul.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-06 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-05 23:46 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-06  2:19 ` Fwd: " Masahiro Yamada
2019-05-06  2:19   ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-05-06  3:31   ` Paul Gortmaker
2019-05-06 12:07     ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-05-06 14:20       ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2019-05-08  4:31         ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190506142010.GC2649@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.