From: osandov@osandov.com (Omar Sandoval)
Subject: [PATCH] blktests: Use old variable check for Bash <4.2
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 12:57:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506195712.GC20450@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2126a9f56ad65c58300b8b2216da7fcec081018.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, May 06, 2019@07:50:04PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-05-06@12:42 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Fri, May 03, 2019@12:28:28PM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > > Bash 4.2 and above supports -v variable checks, which returns true
> > > for
> > > set or null. Instead use an older bashism that is compatible with
> > > bash
> > > 4.1 and earlier but only returns true if the variable is set non-
> > > null.
> > > This inherently adds a sanity check in case of null variables.
> >
> > Bart previous sent a patch for supporting bash 4.1, and according to
> > him, there were some further changes required:
> >
> > https://github.com/osandov/blktests/pull/42
> >
> > Either Bart's list of missing features was too big, or this patch
> > isn't
> > enough to support 4.1. If it's the latter, then this is a no-go,
> > because
> > Bart's change was too intrusive to be worth the hassle. If it's the
> > former, then this change isn't quite as bad, but I'm still not
> > excited
> > about supporting a 10 year old version of Bash.
>
>
> Mine is more than likely some franken-bash. I tested my changes alone
> on a 4.1.2 from RHEL 6.7. RHEL 6.10 is recently released so this
> version of Bash is certainly still in use.
Ah, I didn't realize RHEL was using that version. In that case, I'm
alright with this patch, since it's not quite as nasty as Bart's change.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-03 18:28 [PATCH] blktests: Use old variable check for Bash <4.2 Jon Derrick
2019-05-06 19:42 ` Omar Sandoval
2019-05-06 19:50 ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-05-06 19:57 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190506195712.GC20450@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.