From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman9394@gmail.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] locking changes for v5.2
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 10:24:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190507082413.GA125993@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wifHYK-NKCTbT3_iHpy3QeK7H+=RLbFUaFpPziPn3O8Ng@mail.gmail.com>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:43 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Sure - how close is this to a straight:
> >
> > git revert 70800c3c0cc5
>
> It's not really a revert. The code is different (and better) from the
> straight revert, but perhaps equally importantly it also ends up with
> a big comment about what's going on that made the original commit
> wrong.
>
> So I'd suggest just taking the patch as-is, and not calling it a
> revert. It may revert to the original _model_ of wakup list traversal,
> but it does so differently enough that the patch itself is not a
> revert.
Ok, Waiman's patch is now the following commit in locking/urgent:
a9e9bcb45b15: ("locking/rwsem: Prevent decrement of reader count before increment")
it should get to you in a couple of days.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-07 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-06 8:50 [GIT PULL] locking changes for v5.2 Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 16:11 ` Waiman Long
2019-05-06 19:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-06 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-07 8:24 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-05-07 14:39 ` Waiman Long
2019-05-06 23:40 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190507082413.GA125993@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman9394@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.