From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Probir Roy <proy.cse@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Locality of extent status tree traversal
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 13:59:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190507175921.GD5900@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALe4XzYNBKhtcYvcuME0A29LvPuZEuirD3DLtHnffObRCUU8Rg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:12:07AM -0500, Probir Roy wrote:
>
> I am running Phoronix-fio benchmark on Linux kernel 4.18.0-rc5. I
> observe the same nodes have been traversed on the extent status tree
> in "ext4_es_lookup_extent" function when ext4 write begins. What's the
> locality signature of "ext4_es_lookup_extent" in general? Is it
> possible that same logical block being looked up repeatedly
> (Temporal)? Is it possible that co-located logical blocks are searched
> by ext4_es_lookup_extent (spatial)? Or is it totally random?
I'm not sure what you are asking. The ext4_es_lookup_extent() is used
as a fast map of an inode's logical block number to find the physical
block number (e.g., the location on disk). It's a cache; lookups are
fast, and is an in-memory lookup. Well, it's a little more than a
cache, it also stores some information for delayed allocation buffered
writes.
If the workload is a random read or random write workload, then
accesses to look up logical to physical block maps will be random. If
the workload is mostly a sequential read or sequential write access,
then the logical blocks looked up via ext4_es_lookup_extent() will
largely be sequential.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-07 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-07 16:12 Locality of extent status tree traversal Probir Roy
2019-05-07 17:59 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2019-05-07 18:56 ` Probir Roy
2019-05-07 21:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-06 17:51 locality " Probir Roy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190507175921.GD5900@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=proy.cse@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.