From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 12:27:53 -0700 From: Sami Tolvanen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] crypto: x86: Fix indirect function call casts Message-ID: <20190509192753.GA233211@google.com> References: <20190507161321.34611-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20190507170039.GB1399@sol.localdomain> <20190507215045.GA7528@sol.localdomain> <20190508133606.nsrzthbad5kynavp@gondor.apana.org.au> <20190509020439.GB693@sol.localdomain> <20190509153828.GA261205@google.com> <20190509175822.GB12602@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190509175822.GB12602@gmail.com> To: Eric Biggers Cc: Kees Cook , Herbert Xu , Joao Moreira , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , X86 ML , linux-crypto , LKML , Kernel Hardening List-ID: On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:58:23AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > Is there any way to annotate assembly functions such that they work > directly with CFI? Not to my knowledge. Sami