From: Dominick Grift <dac.override@gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
selinux@vger.kernel.org, Joel Galenson <jgalenson@google.com>,
Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Mislabeled /proc/<pid>/ns/mnt files?
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 09:12:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510071208.GA14283@brutus.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABXk95Au_UVdghpHGuu39mHJkSYA2=7YS__vtx8sxGEH4CuSgg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2712 bytes --]
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 02:47:30PM -0700, Jeffrey Vander Stoep wrote:
> From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
> Date: Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:17 PM
> To: Jeffrey Vander Stoep, <selinux@vger.kernel.org>, Joel Galenson,
> Petr Lautrbach
>
> > On 5/9/19 3:56 PM, Jeffrey Vander Stoep wrote:
> > > I expected files here would have the process's context, but they
> > > don't. The files are actually all symlinks so it's entirely possible
> > > that the they shouldn't have the process's context. If that's the
> > > case, how can I provide different labels for them? Neither "proc" nor
> > > "unlabeled" are appropriate.
> > >
> > > On a device with a 3.18 kernel they have the "proc" context:
> > > sailfish:/ # ls -LZ1 /proc/1/ns
> > > u:object_r:proc:s0 mnt
> > > u:object_r:proc:s0 net
> > >
> > > On a device with the 4.9 kernel the have the "unlabeled" context:
> > > blueline:/ # ls -LZ1 /proc/1/ns
> > > u:object_r:unlabeled:s0 cgroup
> > > u:object_r:unlabeled:s0 mnt
> > > u:object_r:unlabeled:s0 net
> >
> > First, ls -L dereferences symlinks so you are going to get the context
> > of the object referenced by the symlink, not the context of the symlink
> > itself.
>
> I'm seeing a denial on the object not the symlink, so -L is what I want.
>
> >
> > Second, the task context is only assigned to proc inodes created via
> > proc_pid_make_inode(), which has never been the case of /proc/pid/ns
> > inodes - those have their own implementations and operations.
> >
> > Third, /proc/pid/ns migrated from proc to its own pseudo filesystem,
> > nsfs, which requires a corresponding fs_use or genfscon rule in policy
> > or they will be unlabeled. refpolicy has a genfscon rule. Confusingly
> > there appears to be both in Fedora policy, a fs_use_task and a genfscon
> > rule, and it appears that fs_use_task is being applied here. I don't
> > know why or what exactly that means. It won't be the task context for
> > the task associated with that /proc/pid directory but instead would be
> > whichever task context instantiates the inode.
> >
>
> So, how do I label these files in genfs_contexts?
>
> "mount | grep nsfs" returns nothing.
# seinfo --genfs | grep nsfs
genfscon nsfs / sys.id:sys.role:fs.nsfs.fs:s0
Yes, i think this is a step backwards. In the past we got a nice list of objects that have no context associated when policy is loaded.
That list was removed. So sometimes its hard to determine whether something needs a genfscon if its not listen with `mount.
--
Key fingerprint = 5F4D 3CDB D3F8 3652 FBD8 02D5 3B6C 5F1D 2C7B 6B02
https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3B6C5F1D2C7B6B02
Dominick Grift
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-10 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-09 19:56 Mislabeled /proc/<pid>/ns/mnt files? Jeffrey Vander Stoep
2019-05-09 21:11 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-05-09 21:47 ` Jeffrey Vander Stoep
2019-05-10 7:12 ` Dominick Grift [this message]
2019-05-10 14:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-05-10 14:40 ` Dominick Grift
[not found] ` <CAB9W1A2LPEk_XixkFU5mVgr9c2yNoiGzBjXYjpc3vDM1b2VpyA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-10 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-05-10 14:55 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-05-14 20:13 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190510071208.GA14283@brutus.lan \
--to=dac.override@gmail.com \
--cc=jeffv@google.com \
--cc=jgalenson@google.com \
--cc=plautrba@redhat.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.