diff for duplicates of <20190510104338.GB6889@mit.edu> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 79721d2..e44e737 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,46 +5,9 @@ "ref\020190509015856.GB7031@mit.edu\0" "ref\0580e092f-fa4e-eedc-9e9a-a57dd085f0a6@gmail.com\0" "ref\078e4d46e-6212-9871-51d6-dd2126f39d45@gmail.com\0" - "From\0Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework\0" + "From\0tytso at mit.edu (Theodore Ts'o)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework\0" "Date\0Fri, 10 May 2019 06:43:38 -0400\0" - "To\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>" - Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> - keescook@google.com - kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com - mcgrof@kernel.org - robh@kernel.org - sboyd@kernel.org - shuah@kernel.org - devicetree@vger.kernel.org - dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org - kunit-dev@googlegroups.com - linux-doc@vger.kernel.org - linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org - linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org - linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org - linux-um@lists.infradead.org - Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com - Tim.Bird@sony.com - amir73il@gmail.com - dan.carpenter@oracle.com - dan.j.williams@intel.com - daniel@ffwll.ch - jdike@addtoit.com - joel@jms.id.au - julia.lawall@lip6.fr - khilman@baylibre.com - knut.omang@oracle.com - logang@deltatee.com - mpe@ellerman.id.au - pmladek@suse.com - richard@nod.at - rientjes@google.com - rostedt@goodmis.org - " wfg@linux.intel.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:\n" @@ -105,4 +68,4 @@ "evaluation function when judging whether or a test framework is fit\n" for that purpose. -0a46b709a47892c027ea938efffb1b88aab6ce5fda6777b66e4e80691c693cdb +0904a059677da55a85293eb68851cf1efdd36cbd9ab6ee06ae91465109fe9123
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 1ab1916..f30028a 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: +On Thu, May 09, 2019@10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > >> You *can* run in-kernel test using modules; but there is no framework > >> for the in-kernel code found in the test modules, which means each of > >> the in-kernel code has to create their own in-kernel test diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 79721d2..4a57070 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -5,49 +5,12 @@ "ref\020190509015856.GB7031@mit.edu\0" "ref\0580e092f-fa4e-eedc-9e9a-a57dd085f0a6@gmail.com\0" "ref\078e4d46e-6212-9871-51d6-dd2126f39d45@gmail.com\0" - "From\0Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework\0" + "From\0tytso@mit.edu (Theodore Ts'o)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework\0" "Date\0Fri, 10 May 2019 06:43:38 -0400\0" - "To\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>" - Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> - keescook@google.com - kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com - mcgrof@kernel.org - robh@kernel.org - sboyd@kernel.org - shuah@kernel.org - devicetree@vger.kernel.org - dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org - kunit-dev@googlegroups.com - linux-doc@vger.kernel.org - linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org - linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org - linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org - linux-um@lists.infradead.org - Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com - Tim.Bird@sony.com - amir73il@gmail.com - dan.carpenter@oracle.com - dan.j.williams@intel.com - daniel@ffwll.ch - jdike@addtoit.com - joel@jms.id.au - julia.lawall@lip6.fr - khilman@baylibre.com - knut.omang@oracle.com - logang@deltatee.com - mpe@ellerman.id.au - pmladek@suse.com - richard@nod.at - rientjes@google.com - rostedt@goodmis.org - " wfg@linux.intel.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:\n" + "On Thu, May 09, 2019@10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:\n" "> >> You *can* run in-kernel test using modules; but there is no framework\n" "> >> for the in-kernel code found in the test modules, which means each of\n" "> >> the in-kernel code has to create their own in-kernel test\n" @@ -105,4 +68,4 @@ "evaluation function when judging whether or a test framework is fit\n" for that purpose. -0a46b709a47892c027ea938efffb1b88aab6ce5fda6777b66e4e80691c693cdb +7bef387bf026bb701509e1fa552ce9ecb9b5ad6d494266517dfdc07ae7f3d6fc
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index 1ab1916..a317183 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -55,3 +55,7 @@ The question is whether it is the most best and most efficient way to do that testing. And developer velocity is a really big part of my evaluation function when judging whether or a test framework is fit for that purpose. +_______________________________________________ +Linux-nvdimm mailing list +Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org +https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 79721d2..3abd9fa 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -9,42 +9,40 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework\0" "Date\0Fri, 10 May 2019 06:43:38 -0400\0" "To\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>" + "Cc\0pmladek@suse.com" + linux-doc@vger.kernel.org + amir73il@gmail.com Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> - keescook@google.com - kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com - mcgrof@kernel.org - robh@kernel.org - sboyd@kernel.org - shuah@kernel.org - devicetree@vger.kernel.org dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org - kunit-dev@googlegroups.com - linux-doc@vger.kernel.org - linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org - linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com + mpe@ellerman.id.au linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org + shuah@kernel.org + robh@kernel.org linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org - linux-um@lists.infradead.org - Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com - Tim.Bird@sony.com - amir73il@gmail.com - dan.carpenter@oracle.com - dan.j.williams@intel.com - daniel@ffwll.ch - jdike@addtoit.com - joel@jms.id.au - julia.lawall@lip6.fr khilman@baylibre.com knut.omang@oracle.com - logang@deltatee.com - mpe@ellerman.id.au - pmladek@suse.com - richard@nod.at + kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com + wfg@linux.intel.com + joel@jms.id.au rientjes@google.com + jdike@addtoit.com + dan.carpenter@oracle.com + devicetree@vger.kernel.org + linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org + Tim.Bird@sony.com + linux-um@lists.infradead.org rostedt@goodmis.org - " wfg@linux.intel.com\0" + julia.lawall@lip6.fr + kunit-dev@googlegroups.com + richard@nod.at + sboyd@kernel.org + Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + mcgrof@kernel.org + daniel@ffwll.ch + keescook@google.com + " linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:\n" @@ -103,6 +101,10 @@ "The question is whether it is the most best and most efficient way to\n" "do that testing. And developer velocity is a really big part of my\n" "evaluation function when judging whether or a test framework is fit\n" - for that purpose. + "for that purpose.\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "Linux-nvdimm mailing list\n" + "Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org\n" + https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm -0a46b709a47892c027ea938efffb1b88aab6ce5fda6777b66e4e80691c693cdb +efa5565296990e2b378d0086ac234ebe941118185aef1cc83b4a32469eec8e11
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N4/1.txt index 1ab1916..4210687 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N4/1.txt @@ -55,3 +55,8 @@ The question is whether it is the most best and most efficient way to do that testing. And developer velocity is a really big part of my evaluation function when judging whether or a test framework is fit for that purpose. + +_______________________________________________ +linux-um mailing list +linux-um@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N4/content_digest index 79721d2..2d10a26 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N4/content_digest @@ -9,42 +9,42 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework\0" "Date\0Fri, 10 May 2019 06:43:38 -0400\0" "To\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>" + "Cc\0pmladek@suse.com" + linux-doc@vger.kernel.org + amir73il@gmail.com Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> - keescook@google.com - kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com - mcgrof@kernel.org - robh@kernel.org - sboyd@kernel.org - shuah@kernel.org - devicetree@vger.kernel.org dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org - kunit-dev@googlegroups.com - linux-doc@vger.kernel.org - linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org - linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com + mpe@ellerman.id.au linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org + shuah@kernel.org + robh@kernel.org linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org - linux-um@lists.infradead.org - Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com - Tim.Bird@sony.com - amir73il@gmail.com - dan.carpenter@oracle.com - dan.j.williams@intel.com - daniel@ffwll.ch - jdike@addtoit.com - joel@jms.id.au - julia.lawall@lip6.fr khilman@baylibre.com knut.omang@oracle.com - logang@deltatee.com - mpe@ellerman.id.au - pmladek@suse.com - richard@nod.at + kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com + wfg@linux.intel.com + joel@jms.id.au rientjes@google.com + jdike@addtoit.com + dan.carpenter@oracle.com + devicetree@vger.kernel.org + linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org + Tim.Bird@sony.com + linux-um@lists.infradead.org rostedt@goodmis.org - " wfg@linux.intel.com\0" + julia.lawall@lip6.fr + dan.j.williams@intel.com + kunit-dev@googlegroups.com + richard@nod.at + sboyd@kernel.org + Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + mcgrof@kernel.org + daniel@ffwll.ch + keescook@google.com + linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org + " logang@deltatee.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:\n" @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ "The question is whether it is the most best and most efficient way to\n" "do that testing. And developer velocity is a really big part of my\n" "evaluation function when judging whether or a test framework is fit\n" - for that purpose. + "for that purpose.\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-um mailing list\n" + "linux-um@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um -0a46b709a47892c027ea938efffb1b88aab6ce5fda6777b66e4e80691c693cdb +abf9598229162f9ee29718e011e0cce285ba70ae6e6e31a649a6b29e4d4ca8b6
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N5/content_digest index 79721d2..9c19438 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N5/content_digest @@ -5,46 +5,45 @@ "ref\020190509015856.GB7031@mit.edu\0" "ref\0580e092f-fa4e-eedc-9e9a-a57dd085f0a6@gmail.com\0" "ref\078e4d46e-6212-9871-51d6-dd2126f39d45@gmail.com\0" - "From\0Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>\0" + "ref\078e4d46e-6212-9871-51d6-dd2126f39d45-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework\0" "Date\0Fri, 10 May 2019 06:43:38 -0400\0" - "To\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>" - Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> - keescook@google.com - kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com - mcgrof@kernel.org - robh@kernel.org - sboyd@kernel.org - shuah@kernel.org - devicetree@vger.kernel.org - dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org - kunit-dev@googlegroups.com - linux-doc@vger.kernel.org - linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org - linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org - linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org - linux-um@lists.infradead.org - Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com - Tim.Bird@sony.com - amir73il@gmail.com - dan.carpenter@oracle.com - dan.j.williams@intel.com - daniel@ffwll.ch - jdike@addtoit.com - joel@jms.id.au - julia.lawall@lip6.fr - khilman@baylibre.com - knut.omang@oracle.com - logang@deltatee.com - mpe@ellerman.id.au - pmladek@suse.com - richard@nod.at - rientjes@google.com - rostedt@goodmis.org - " wfg@linux.intel.com\0" + "To\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Cc\0pmladek-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org" + linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + amir73il-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org + Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> + dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org + Alexander.Levin-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org + mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org + linux-kselftest-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + shuah-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org + robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org + linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org + khilman-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org + knut.omang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org + kieran.bingham-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org + wfg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org + joel-U3u1mxZcP9KHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org + rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org + jdike-OPE4K8JWMJJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org + dan.carpenter-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org + devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + linux-kbuild-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + Tim.Bird-7U/KSKJipcs@public.gmane.org + linux-um-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org + rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org + julia.lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org + kunit-dev-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org + richard-/L3Ra7n9ekc@public.gmane.org + sboyd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org + Greg KH <gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> + linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + mcgrof-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org + daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org + keescook-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org + " linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:\n" @@ -105,4 +104,4 @@ "evaluation function when judging whether or a test framework is fit\n" for that purpose. -0a46b709a47892c027ea938efffb1b88aab6ce5fda6777b66e4e80691c693cdb +6306c36218d9ea915df2935b44fded7f5f41ca934e0e941970912f2a34e2bd8e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.