All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FYI -ffreestanding shrinks kernel by 2% on x86_64
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 20:55:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190512175554.GA10777@avx2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190512093228.GA8088@gmail.com>

On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 11:32:28AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 11:02:24PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > I compiled current F29 kernel config on x86_64 (5.0.13-200.fc29.x86_64)
> > > with -ffreestanding. The results are interesting :^):
> > > 
> > > 	add/remove: 30/22 grow/shrink: 1290/46867 up/down: 33658/-1778055 (-1744397)
> > > 	Total: Before=83298859, After=81554462, chg -2.09% (!)
> > > 
> > > That's original config with modules compiled built-in.
> > 
> > Argh, it's the other way: adding -ffreestanding shrinks kernel by 2%.
> 
> This is a very interesting finding, as we've seen numerous code 
> generation artifacts from GCC assuming libgcc things.
> 
> Has anyone investigated by any chance where the -ffreestanding space 
> savings come from mostly - is it mostly in cold paths, or does it make or 
> hot codepaths more efficient as well?
> 
> If it's the latter then the kernel would be directly faster as well 
> (fewer instructions executed), not just indirectly from better cache 
> packing, I suppse?

Turns out -ffreestanding completely disables stack protector :-\

F29				83298859
-ffreestanding			-1744397	-2.09%
STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=n		-1369949	-1.64%

Builtin function are in noise, e.g -fno-builtin-sprintf is only -14KB.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-12 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-11 20:02 FYI -ffreestanding bloats kernel by 2% on x86_64 Alexey Dobriyan
2019-05-11 20:13 ` FYI -ffreestanding shrinks " Alexey Dobriyan
2019-05-12  9:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-12 17:55     ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2019-05-13  9:13     ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190512175554.GA10777@avx2 \
    --to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.