From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: LAPIC: Extract adaptive tune timer advancement logic
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 12:39:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190513193940.GL28561@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1557401361-3828-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 07:29:19PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
>
> Extract adaptive tune timer advancement logic to a single function.
Why?
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index bd13fdd..e7a0660 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1501,11 +1501,41 @@ static inline void __wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_cycles)
> }
> }
>
> -void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static inline void adaptive_tune_timer_advancement(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u64 guest_tsc, u64 tsc_deadline)
> {
> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> u32 timer_advance_ns = apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns;
> - u64 guest_tsc, tsc_deadline, ns;
> + u64 ns;
> +
> + if (!apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done) {
> + /* too early */
> + if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline) {
> + ns = (tsc_deadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL;
> + do_div(ns, vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz);
> + timer_advance_ns -= min((u32)ns,
> + timer_advance_ns / LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_STEP);
> + } else {
> + /* too late */
> + ns = (guest_tsc - tsc_deadline) * 1000000ULL;
> + do_div(ns, vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz);
> + timer_advance_ns += min((u32)ns,
> + timer_advance_ns / LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_STEP);
> + }
> + if (abs(guest_tsc - tsc_deadline) < LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_DONE)
> + apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
> + if (unlikely(timer_advance_ns > 5000)) {
> + timer_advance_ns = 0;
> + apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
> + }
> + apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns = timer_advance_ns;
> + }
This whole block is indented too far.
> +}
> +
> +void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> + u64 guest_tsc, tsc_deadline;
>
> if (apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline == 0)
> return;
> @@ -1521,28 +1551,7 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline)
> __wait_lapic_expire(vcpu, tsc_deadline - guest_tsc);
>
> - if (!apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done) {
> - /* too early */
> - if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline) {
> - ns = (tsc_deadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL;
> - do_div(ns, vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz);
> - timer_advance_ns -= min((u32)ns,
> - timer_advance_ns / LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_STEP);
> - } else {
> - /* too late */
> - ns = (guest_tsc - tsc_deadline) * 1000000ULL;
> - do_div(ns, vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz);
> - timer_advance_ns += min((u32)ns,
> - timer_advance_ns / LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_STEP);
> - }
> - if (abs(guest_tsc - tsc_deadline) < LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_DONE)
> - apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
> - if (unlikely(timer_advance_ns > 5000)) {
> - timer_advance_ns = 0;
> - apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
> - }
> - apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns = timer_advance_ns;
> - }
> + adaptive_tune_timer_advancement(vcpu, guest_tsc, tsc_deadline);
> }
>
> static void start_sw_tscdeadline(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-13 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-09 11:29 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: LAPIC: Optimize timer latency further Wanpeng Li
2019-05-09 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: LAPIC: Extract adaptive tune timer advancement logic Wanpeng Li
2019-05-13 19:39 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-05-14 0:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-05-09 11:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: LAPIC: Fix lapic_timer_advance_ns parameter overflow Wanpeng Li
2019-05-13 19:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-05-09 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: LAPIC: Optimize timer latency further Wanpeng Li
2019-05-13 19:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-05-14 1:45 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-05-14 10:56 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-05-14 16:45 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190513193940.GL28561@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.