All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	Talel Shenhar <talel@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the thermal-soc tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 07:15:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514141531.GA16968@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190514144006.60df13bb@canb.auug.org.au>

Hey Stephen,

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 02:40:06PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
> 
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 20:44:11 -0700 Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for spotting this. I am re-doing the branch based off v5.1-rc7,
> > where the last conflict went in with my current queue.
> 
> Its really not worth the rebase.  Just fix the build problem and send it
> all to Linus.

Yeah, I think I was not super clear in my first email. I am about to
send the content of my branch to Linus.  This specific conflict was
because a change in MAINTAINERS went in before the change I have in it,
causing a conflict there. The rebase is simply to make it easier for him
to pull when I send the git pull.

> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-14 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-13  0:49 linux-next: manual merge of the thermal-soc tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-14  3:44 ` Eduardo Valentin
2019-05-14  4:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-14 14:15     ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2019-05-15  0:44       ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-15  0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2017-10-30 16:42 Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190514141531.GA16968@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=galpress@amazon.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=talel@amazon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.