From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFE7C04AAF for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A7820856 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:22:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1558344171; bh=PsxfniQOPMMDI3l/DDYlfBJYYQZiGyBazkMX4yCN6L0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=w8lpVXP9U8Wjwkd9bxarlTDF4nVeUJQXCWEQmQZ2UykE7eyUHpnyblJEK7Q4Z99Yl fIeM9/PvnlGN/OcQLQwQLkbzF+ottegZhpMgxu/d+ZMSFToe8wwUO1zeYMKYYSfv+Z yE+VesD04Qm1Xon3QuuieHI+Dowq0BNVAAGqQBPg= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731163AbfETJWu (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 05:22:50 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40218 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729598AbfETJWu (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 05:22:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3A8F20675; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:22:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1558344170; bh=PsxfniQOPMMDI3l/DDYlfBJYYQZiGyBazkMX4yCN6L0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qx4ivefQc0T6NG5uZoOd0cfwjCuAsd0rDlx7Pyp5P8hseno3a0mXIYSgPBhAb2SFM s1b7VqTSRn4MIiPGw8qbRA9L0oH7CnhQkL1l/BbctJFlJu785yNuYmbA4Fgdayrx6/ gaabQ/IFtq00bUa2SFT+/np3+rvaprg+Y5s6Flds= Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 11:22:47 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 01/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 1 Message-ID: <20190520092247.GA1605@kroah.com> References: <20190519135130.462579320@linutronix.de> <20190519154040.652910950@linutronix.de> <20190520090049.GA27213@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:04:12AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 20 May 2019, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > Commenting only on the first instance of this in the series: > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-cpuimx51.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-cpuimx51.dtsi > > > @@ -1,19 +1,6 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > > > I thought we were sticking with the "GPL-2.0+" string for this? > > > > I know we support both in the scripts and the license parsing, is it > > just a "up to the sender" as to what they prefer? > > I don't have a preference, but IMO sticking with the latest SPDX version is > probably the right thing to do. I did not make an intentional choice as > this is just what scancode exposes as concluded SPDX license identifier. Ok, fair enough, as long as we don't have to go and change all existing files to one or the other, I'm happy :) thanks, greg k-h