All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Question about IRQs during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 06:05:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521055650-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190521094407.ltij4ggbd7xw25ge@steredhat>

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:44:07AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi Micheal, Jason,
> as suggested by Stefan, I'm checking if we have some races in the
> virtio-vsock driver. We found some races in the .probe() and .remove()
> with the upper layer (socket) and I'll fix it.
> 
> Now my attention is on the bottom layer (virtio device) and my question is:
> during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver (virtio_vsock_remove), could happen
> that an IRQ comes and one of our callback (e.g. virtio_vsock_rx_done()) is
> executed, queueing new works?
> 
> I tried to follow the code in both cases (device unplugged or module removed)
> and maybe it couldn't happen because we remove it from bus's knowledge,
> but I'm not sure and your advice would be very helpful.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Stefano


Great question! This should be better documented: patches welcome!

Here's my understanding:


A typical removal flow works like this:

- prevent linux from sending new kick requests to device
  and flush such outstanding requests if any
  (device can still send notifications to linux)

- call
          vi->vdev->config->reset(vi->vdev);
  this will flush all device writes and interrupts.
  device will not use any more buffers.
  previously outstanding callbacks might still be active.

- Then call
          vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
  to flush outstanding callbacks if any.

-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-21 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-21  9:44 Question about IRQs during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-21 10:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-05-21 13:49   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-21 13:56     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-21 14:12       ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-22  3:44       ` Jason Wang
2019-05-23 13:56         ` Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190521055650-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.