From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com (mail-wr1-f66.google.com [209.85.221.66]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73F17D3CE for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 20:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id t7so3380294wrr.10 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 13:09:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cY4S0ENcCM1HwOQxJr4uXftl6XTNHAj5xxeYeJVmLKs=; b=eRuYYzmQEdq+U+FVB6HlOyEO+H2IN5FBczvs62DPWDjylw49bnHh4uNBeOQ1Aewq4S iStQ9DeeFVd4R+ydxtdMBeQwCZz3bVYu+QUKxxh3LjKBCe/bkudv7TT2qd75v0UU+zYh v1h69IHxZi3mNEl25jv3prLXTUbrLdwuJnKSttg97133oHi394BHDyHiRdkntqk66lHK Qs16vn6AaRcIVuBh5Q0KhKKDeHh1ydZhtQUgp5W8TO8l3yq4bZvB16hO0Hh2dMp70Hf/ lMeRKwjKQ2Ddx9KFPTWFtmwxTJDqYJ4bFMPW7u6uvdaNAnThhIQQ6ezOz/sRhm5VoFB4 sBcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cY4S0ENcCM1HwOQxJr4uXftl6XTNHAj5xxeYeJVmLKs=; b=BLM/H2VaYEXaAXjjN88CXNzbSdnZoUkjw+j+BQfVpBY98D1yetlXhHL4NPMxMp15NZ N3H5RT8lIsedBVPvRIYk7lVtYyWL9NRQsiG9oZrESZtDnZ+5RK1WCsmXHjpajpJpw+D5 OQ5KpejWEcQJe6xsqtKOGsmZX0eJgviNft0UQBmTa58OKAxU1BgYxMBJk5ixg1jF7L/f cODFFMC4YHgQFybclxezqKRyFo6VjLIz61rx+Ukul9VhI4zrAjvdbKFCTsajNrEZtb97 k0Y13+xrR0biWFNcz0QSYdSZahzcyze9zkUyvfQgQxzpnmbBYottZYwBhFXWTIMs897q huVA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVsVctTTaf291oIcMMfubymBN3dQFHXNka5vPE3si1hxTqUi2eB GoXp0Raa2qlKFCvH7HQqm2I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw7HUmLrH/NPfnaiHPI9/3WB55NkqbHyaB8dYreE5YOyTr6NGYzeGT6VaL7o4uIFS4BbM5lyw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ec8e:: with SMTP id z14mr27787635wrn.198.1558555747400; Wed, 22 May 2019 13:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-217-030-068-212.aim-net.cz. [217.30.68.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b18sm23303794wrx.75.2019.05.22.13.09.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 May 2019 13:09:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 22:09:16 +0200 To: Adrian Bunk Message-ID: <20190522200916.GA1421@jama> References: <20190522141825.GA7379@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190522141825.GA7379@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] util-linux: Add missing ptest dependencies X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 20:09:07 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 124868 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 05:18:25PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:03:37PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > This pulls bc to many images with busybox, causing busybox postinst to = fail > > with: > >=20 > > update-alternatives: Error: not linking /usr/bin/bc to /bin/busybox.nos= uid > > since /usr/bin/bc exists and is not a link >=20 > Are you enabling CONFIG_BC in your busybox config? > It is not enabled in meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/defconfig It's not disabled in my defconfig like it is in meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/defconfig, maybe it got auto enabled. In log.do_configure I see: =2E.. * * Miscellaneous Utilities * adjtimex (4.7 kb) (ADJTIMEX) [N/y/?] n bbconfig (9.7 kb) (BBCONFIG) [N/y/?] n bc (45 kb) (BC) [Y/n/?] (NEW) dc (36 kb) (DC) [Y/n/?] y Use bc code base for dc (larger, more features) (FEATURE_DC_BIG) [Y] (NEW= ) y Interactive mode (+4kb) (FEATURE_BC_INTERACTIVE) [Y/n/?] (NEW) Enab= le bc/dc long options (FEATURE_BC_LONG_OPTIONS) [Y/n] (NEW) beep (2.4 kb) (= BEEP) [N/y/?] n chat (6.3 kb) (CHAT) [N/y/?] n conspy (10 kb) (CONSPY) [N/y/?] n =2E.. > > I'll check which busybox defconfig entry enables BC and send patch to u= se > > u-a for bc in ./meta/recipes-extended/bc/bc_1.07.1.bb > >=20 > > There already is: > > ALTERNATIVE_${PN} =3D "dc" > > ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY =3D "100" > > but maybe dc is a typo. >=20 > bc and dc are two different binaries built from bc. >=20 > busybox used to only have dc, bc was added 6 months ago. Thanks I've never noticed dc before. I see both dc and bc in 1.06 version from meta-gplv2 which was released on 2000-11-15 bc/1.06-r3/image/usr/bin/bc As there is already u-a for dc, I will sent u-a for bc as well. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRU+ejDffEzV2Je2oc3VSO3ZXaAHAUCXOWsawAKCRA3VSO3ZXaA HNFFAJ0U7VyxeBZOgSUUMsaPg/8f2bN1FwCgi24tUh1vFtAwGEWjPwbJgD4HPY0= =bGew -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--