All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524081333.GA15566@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524000653.13005-4-atish.patra@wdc.com>

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> a common place instead of duplicate code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h |  23 ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c      | 303 +-----------------------------
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c      | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h     |  28 +++
>  include/linux/topology.h          |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)

What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c?  That's
nice for everyone else, but not me :(

Ugh.

Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series?  I think we need
some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524081333.GA15566@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524000653.13005-4-atish.patra@wdc.com>

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> a common place instead of duplicate code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h |  23 ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c      | 303 +-----------------------------
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c      | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h     |  28 +++
>  include/linux/topology.h          |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)

What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c?  That's
nice for everyone else, but not me :(

Ugh.

Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series?  I think we need
some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524081333.GA15566@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524000653.13005-4-atish.patra@wdc.com>

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> a common place instead of duplicate code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h |  23 ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c      | 303 +-----------------------------
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c      | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h     |  28 +++
>  include/linux/topology.h          |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)

What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c?  That's
nice for everyone else, but not me :(

Ugh.

Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series?  I think we need
some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524081333.GA15566@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524000653.13005-4-atish.patra@wdc.com>

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> a common place instead of duplicate code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h |  23 ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c      | 303 +-----------------------------
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c      | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h     |  28 +++
>  include/linux/topology.h          |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)

What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c?  That's
nice for everyone else, but not me :(

Ugh.

Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series?  I think we need
some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-24  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-24  0:06 [RFT PATCH v5 0/5] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06 ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06 ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06 ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: DT: arm: add support for sockets defining package boundaries Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 2/5] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  8:13   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-05-24  8:13     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-24  8:13     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-24  8:13     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-24  8:57     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-24  8:57       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-24  8:57       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-24  8:57       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-24  9:38       ` Will Deacon
2019-05-24  9:38         ` Will Deacon
2019-05-24  9:38         ` Will Deacon
2019-05-24  9:38         ` Will Deacon
2019-05-29 10:48   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-29 10:48     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-29 10:48     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-29 10:48     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-29 17:24     ` Atish Patra
2019-05-29 17:24       ` Atish Patra
2019-05-29 17:24       ` Atish Patra
2019-05-29 17:24       ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 4/5] arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and functions Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-29 15:10   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-29 15:10     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-29 15:10     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-29 15:10     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-24  0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 5/5] RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24  0:06   ` Atish Patra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190524081333.GA15566@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=ottosabart@seberm.com \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.