Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.

[Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>]

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:57:40AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:13:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> > > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> > > a common place instead of duplicate code.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> > > Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h |  23 ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c      | 303 +-----------------------------
> > >  drivers/base/arch_topology.c      | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/arch_topology.h     |  28 +++
> > >  include/linux/topology.h          |   1 +
> > >  5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)
> >
> > What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c?  That's
> > nice for everyone else, but not me :(
> >
> > Ugh.
> >
> > Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series?  I think we need
> > some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing,
> > right?
> >
> 
> Greg, I am ready to take ownership. Juri the original author of this file
> agreed and I have been reviewing this file since Juri first wrote it.
> I am happy to submit a patch assuming maintainership for this file, was
> just waiting to hear from you when I asked explicitly you and Juri in
> last version of the patch when Will wanted someone from ARM to be reviewer
> of this file at-least. I am happy to take over as reviewer or maintainer
> which ever you prefer.

Yes, please just include this update to MAINTAINERS as part of the series.
I'll ack it.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv