Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] acpi: introduce AcpiDeviceIfClass.build_mem_ranges hook

[Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>]

On Wed,  8 May 2019 14:17:19 +0800
Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com> wrote:

> Add build_mem_ranges callback to AcpiDeviceIfClass and use
> it for generating SRAT and HMAT numa memory ranges.
> 
> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Co-developed-by: Liu Jingqi <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Jingqi <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v4 -> v3:
>     - spilt the 1/8 of v3 patch into two patches, 4/13 introduces
>     build_mem_ranges() and adding it to ACPI interface, 5/13 builds
>     HMAT (Igor)
> ---
>  hw/acpi/piix4.c                      |   1 +
>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c                 | 116 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c                    |   1 +
>  include/hw/acpi/acpi_dev_interface.h |   3 +
>  include/hw/boards.h                  |  12 +++
>  include/hw/i386/pc.h                 |   1 +
>  stubs/Makefile.objs                  |   1 +
>  stubs/pc_build_mem_ranges.c          |   6 ++
>  8 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 stubs/pc_build_mem_ranges.c
> 
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/piix4.c b/hw/acpi/piix4.c
> index 9c079d6834..7c320a49b2 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/piix4.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/piix4.c
> @@ -723,6 +723,7 @@ static void piix4_pm_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>      adevc->ospm_status = piix4_ospm_status;
>      adevc->send_event = piix4_send_gpe;
>      adevc->madt_cpu = pc_madt_cpu_entry;
> +    adevc->build_mem_ranges = pc_build_mem_ranges;
>  }
>  
>  static const TypeInfo piix4_pm_info = {
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 43a807c483..5598e7f780 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -2271,6 +2271,65 @@ build_tpm2(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, GArray *tcpalog)
>  #define HOLE_640K_START  (640 * KiB)
>  #define HOLE_640K_END   (1 * MiB)
>  
> +void pc_build_mem_ranges(AcpiDeviceIf *adev, MachineState *ms)
> +{
> +    uint64_t mem_len, mem_base, next_base;
> +    int i;
> +    PCMachineState *pcms = PC_MACHINE(ms);
> +    /*
> +     * the memory map is a bit tricky, it contains at least one hole
> +     * from 640k-1M and possibly another one from 3.5G-4G.
> +     */
> +    NumaMemRange *mem_ranges = ms->numa_state->mem_ranges;
> +    ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num = 0;
> +    next_base = 0;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < pcms->numa_nodes; ++i) {
> +        mem_base = next_base;
> +        mem_len = pcms->node_mem[i];
> +        next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
> +
> +        /* Cut out the 640K hole */
> +        if (mem_base <= HOLE_640K_START &&
> +            next_base > HOLE_640K_START) {
> +            mem_len -= next_base - HOLE_640K_START;
> +            if (mem_len > 0) {
> +                mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].base = mem_base;
> +                mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].length = mem_len;
> +                mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].node = i;
> +                ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num++;
> +            }
> +
> +            /* Check for the rare case: 640K < RAM < 1M */
> +            if (next_base <= HOLE_640K_END) {
> +                next_base = HOLE_640K_END;
> +                continue;
> +            }
> +            mem_base = HOLE_640K_END;
> +            mem_len = next_base - HOLE_640K_END;
> +        }
> +
> +        /* Cut out the ACPI_PCI hole */
> +        if (mem_base <= pcms->below_4g_mem_size &&
> +            next_base > pcms->below_4g_mem_size) {
> +            mem_len -= next_base - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
> +            if (mem_len > 0) {
> +                mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].base = mem_base;
> +                mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].length = mem_len;
> +                mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].node = i;
> +                ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num++;
> +            }
> +            mem_base = 1ULL << 32;
> +            mem_len = next_base - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
> +            next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
> +        }


> +        mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].base = mem_base;
> +        mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].length = mem_len;
> +        mem_ranges[ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num].node = i;
> +        ms->numa_state->mem_ranges_num++;

why did you drop 'if (mem_len > 0) {' as it was in original code?

> +
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, MachineState *machine)
>  {
> @@ -2279,10 +2338,13 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, MachineState *machine)
>  
>      int i;
>      int srat_start, numa_start, slots;
> -    uint64_t mem_len, mem_base, next_base;
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
>      const CPUArchIdList *apic_ids = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
>      PCMachineState *pcms = PC_MACHINE(machine);
> +    AcpiDeviceIfClass *adevc = ACPI_DEVICE_IF_GET_CLASS(pcms->acpi_dev);
> +    AcpiDeviceIf *adev = ACPI_DEVICE_IF(pcms->acpi_dev);
> +    uint32_t mem_ranges_num = machine->numa_state->mem_ranges_num;
> +    NumaMemRange *mem_ranges = machine->numa_state->mem_ranges;
>      ram_addr_t hotplugabble_address_space_size =
>          object_property_get_int(OBJECT(pcms), PC_MACHINE_DEVMEM_REGION_SIZE,
>                                  NULL);
> @@ -2319,57 +2381,21 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, MachineState *machine)
>          }
>      }
>  
> +    if (pcms->numa_nodes && !mem_ranges_num) {
> +        adevc->build_mem_ranges(adev, machine);
> +    }
>  
> -    /* the memory map is a bit tricky, it contains at least one hole
> -     * from 640k-1M and possibly another one from 3.5G-4G.
> -     */
> -    next_base = 0;
>      numa_start = table_data->len;
>  
> -    for (i = 1; i < pcms->numa_nodes + 1; ++i) {
> -        mem_base = next_base;
> -        mem_len = pcms->node_mem[i - 1];
> -        next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
> -
> -        /* Cut out the 640K hole */
> -        if (mem_base <= HOLE_640K_START &&
> -            next_base > HOLE_640K_START) {
> -            mem_len -= next_base - HOLE_640K_START;
> -            if (mem_len > 0) {
> +    for (i = 0; i < mem_ranges_num; i++) {
> +        if (mem_ranges[i].length > 0) {
>                  numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> -                build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,
> +            build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_ranges[i].base,
> +                              mem_ranges[i].length,
> +                              mem_ranges[i].node,
>                                    MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
>              }
> -
> -            /* Check for the rare case: 640K < RAM < 1M */
> -            if (next_base <= HOLE_640K_END) {
> -                next_base = HOLE_640K_END;
> -                continue;
>              }
> -            mem_base = HOLE_640K_END;
> -            mem_len = next_base - HOLE_640K_END;
> -        }
> -
> -        /* Cut out the ACPI_PCI hole */
> -        if (mem_base <= pcms->below_4g_mem_size &&
> -            next_base > pcms->below_4g_mem_size) {
> -            mem_len -= next_base - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
> -            if (mem_len > 0) {
> -                numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> -                build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,
> -                                  MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
> -            }
> -            mem_base = 1ULL << 32;
> -            mem_len = next_base - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
> -            next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
> -        }
> -
> -        if (mem_len > 0) {
> -            numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> -            build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,
> -                              MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
> -        }
> -    }
>      slots = (table_data->len - numa_start) / sizeof *numamem;
>      for (; slots < pcms->numa_nodes + 2; slots++) {
>          numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> index ac44aa53be..4ae64846ba 100644
> --- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> @@ -812,6 +812,7 @@ static void ich9_lpc_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>      adevc->ospm_status = ich9_pm_ospm_status;
>      adevc->send_event = ich9_send_gpe;
>      adevc->madt_cpu = pc_madt_cpu_entry;
> +    adevc->build_mem_ranges = pc_build_mem_ranges;
>  }
>  
>  static const TypeInfo ich9_lpc_info = {
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi_dev_interface.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi_dev_interface.h
> index 43ff119179..d8634ac1ed 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi_dev_interface.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi_dev_interface.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ void acpi_send_event(DeviceState *dev, AcpiEventStatusBits event);
>   *           for CPU indexed by @uid in @apic_ids array,
>   *           returned structure types are:
>   *           0 - Local APIC, 9 - Local x2APIC, 0xB - GICC
> + * build_mem_ranges: build memory ranges of ACPI SRAT and HMAT

it's not exactly what it does, it does above only partially leaving out misc
and hotplug SRAT ranges.

>   *
>   * Interface is designed for providing unified interface
>   * to generic ACPI functionality that could be used without
> @@ -54,5 +55,7 @@ typedef struct AcpiDeviceIfClass {
>      void (*send_event)(AcpiDeviceIf *adev, AcpiEventStatusBits ev);
>      void (*madt_cpu)(AcpiDeviceIf *adev, int uid,
>                       const CPUArchIdList *apic_ids, GArray *entry);
> +    void (*build_mem_ranges)(AcpiDeviceIf *adev, MachineState *ms);
> +
>  } AcpiDeviceIfClass;
>  #endif
> diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> index 777eed4dd9..9fbf921ecf 100644
> --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> @@ -240,6 +240,12 @@ struct NodeInfo {
>      uint8_t distance[MAX_NODES];
>  };
>  
> +typedef struct NumaMemRange {
> +    uint64_t base;
> +    uint64_t length;
> +    uint32_t node;
> +} NumaMemRange;
> +
>  typedef struct NumaState {
>      /* Number of NUMA nodes */
>      int num_nodes;
> @@ -249,6 +255,12 @@ typedef struct NumaState {
>  
>      /* NUMA nodes information */
>      NodeInfo nodes[MAX_NODES];
> +
> +    /* Number of NUMA memory ranges */
> +    uint32_t mem_ranges_num;
> +
> +    /* NUMA memory ranges */
> +    NumaMemRange mem_ranges[MAX_NODES + 2];
why MAX_NODES + 2 ???
I'd use GArray here instead of 2 above fields

>  } NumaState;
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> index 43df7230a2..1e4ee404ae 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ void pc_system_firmware_init(PCMachineState *pcms, MemoryRegion *rom_memory);
>  /* acpi-build.c */
>  void pc_madt_cpu_entry(AcpiDeviceIf *adev, int uid,
>                         const CPUArchIdList *apic_ids, GArray *entry);
> +void pc_build_mem_ranges(AcpiDeviceIf *adev, MachineState *ms);
>  
>  /* e820 types */
>  #define E820_RAM        1
> diff --git a/stubs/Makefile.objs b/stubs/Makefile.objs
> index 269dfa5832..7e0a962815 100644
> --- a/stubs/Makefile.objs
> +++ b/stubs/Makefile.objs
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ stub-obj-y += qmp_memory_device.o
>  stub-obj-y += target-monitor-defs.o
>  stub-obj-y += target-get-monitor-def.o
>  stub-obj-y += pc_madt_cpu_entry.o
> +stub-obj-y += pc_build_mem_ranges.o
>  stub-obj-y += vmgenid.o
>  stub-obj-y += xen-common.o
>  stub-obj-y += xen-hvm.o
> diff --git a/stubs/pc_build_mem_ranges.c b/stubs/pc_build_mem_ranges.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..0f104ba79d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/stubs/pc_build_mem_ranges.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "hw/i386/pc.h"
> +
> +void pc_build_mem_ranges(AcpiDeviceIf *adev, MachineState *machine)
> +{
> +}

why do you need stub?