All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FS_EXT4 for all MX6 platforms
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 10:22:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190526102200.796afadc@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb9c74e8-fd20-a530-f292-088134ff2bed@denx.de>

Dear Marek, Tom,

> On 5/26/19 1:23 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 01:20:34AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:  
> >> On 5/26/19 1:08 AM, Tom Rini wrote:  
> >>> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 12:57:08AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:  
> >>>> On 5/26/19 12:45 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:  
> >>>>> On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 00:24 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:  
> >>>>>> On 5/25/19 11:47 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:  
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 2019-05-25 at 22:15 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:  
> >>>>>>>> On 5/25/19 6:49 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:  
> >>>>>>>>> i.MX6 platforms boot U-Boot second-stage from unformatted
> >>>>>>>>> space, and should not need Ext filesystem support on SPL.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The commit was generated with:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> git grep -l MX6 -- configs/ | xargs grep -l SPL_FS_EXT4 |
> >>>>>>>>> xargs sed -i -e '/CONFIG_SPL_FS_EXT4=y/d'
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This change has a dramatic impact on SPL size:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ./scripts/bloat-o-meter old new
> >>>>>>>>> add/remove: 0/59 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-8674 (-8674)
> >>>>>>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>>>> Total: Before=38320, After=29646, chg -22.64%
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: "Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Breno Lima <breno.lima@nxp.com>
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Francesco Montefoschi <francesco.montefoschi@udoo.org>
> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
> >>>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>> Tested on Wandboard only. Maintainers, please ACK or NAK!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/cgtqmx6eval_defconfig       | 1 -
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/mx6cuboxi_defconfig         | 1 -
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/mx6sabreauto_defconfig      | 1 -
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/mx6sabresd_defconfig        | 1 -
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/mx6slevk_spl_defconfig      | 1 -
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/mx6sxsabresd_spl_defconfig  | 1 -
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/mx6ul_14x14_evk_defconfig   | 1 -
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/mx6ul_9x9_evk_defconfig     | 1 -
> >>>>>>>>>  configs/novena_defconfig            | 1 -  
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> NAK, I boot my Novena from ext4 and this just broke it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And also, NAK, this removes functionality from SPL which
> >>>>>>>> worked fine before. 
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'll drop from Novena, but I think the patch still makes some
> >>>>>>> sense, why do you want Ext4 on SPL?  
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What other filesystem is available in SPL and doesn't have
> >>>>>> patent problems ? 
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry for not being clear. I am asking why turn on a feature
> >>>>> that is so heavy, on a system that won't need it (such as
> >>>>> Sabre* boards, Wandboard and similar)?  
> >>>>
> >>>> Two reasons:
> >>>> 1) It was enabled, disabling it means removing functionality for
> >>>> no good reason (oops, bloat, is not a good reason), and that is
> >>>> not desired. 2) Booting from block device implies booting from a
> >>>> filesystem, otherwise you might overwrite various things on the
> >>>> block device when updating the file (u-boot image).  
> >>>
> >>> So, are you using SPL to load something from ext4 or not?  
> >>
> >> Yes, I think that's what I said.
> >>  
> >>> There are
> >>> setups where people have configured the system such that SPL loads
> >>> something from ext4 and that's why we have it available.  Is
> >>> anyone doing that on Novena?  Or any iMX system?  
> >>
> >> Quoting my first response in this thread:
> >> "
> >> NAK, I boot my Novena from ext4 and this just broke it.
> >> "  
> > 
> > Actually, I wasn't sure from your first response if you're using
> > SPL to load u-boot from EXT4 or not.  So, Novena is a no and we
> > should wait for more board maintainers to speak up to see if they
> > use it or not, thanks!  
> 
> Novena is certainly a no. Since I use a couple of wandboards, those
> are no as well.
> 
> But I do not want to see useful functionality removed from SPL only to
> make space for useless DM/DT bloat. Temporarily band-aiding this real
> problem by removing functionality is a no-go, no matter how you slice
> it. The real fix is to fix the DM/DT and figure out a way to reduce
> it's size and _retain_ _all_ the functionality.
> 

I fully agree with Marek here - the DM/DT SPL support (in the form as
it is now) is a bloat. The SPL size increases considerably.

The _real_ issue is the lack of OF_PLATDATA support for DM/DTS drivers,
which are used when we convert u-boot to DM/DTS.

For boards, which have enough internal on-chip RAM (OCRAM in case of
imx6q) it is doable to convert them to DM/DTS in SPL.

However, nobody wants to say it loud, but the footprint considerably
increases in SPL - for example:

SPL (and I only use eMMC there - no SPI, no I2C):
------------------------------------------------
Before conversion:                              35 KiB
DM conversion:					47 KiB
(around ~25% increase)


For u-boot proper:
----------------------------
Footprint changes (u-boot.imx):

Before conversion:                              345 KiB
DM conversion:                    415 KiB
(around + 17% increase)


This has several implications:

1. We replace small, robust SPL (I speak only for i.MX) with something
which is XX% larger and hence boot time increases. In short - customers
are/will not be happy. We do introduce regression here.

2. To make it usable (with the size comparable to what we do have now)
we need to add OF_PLATDATA support to eMMC, SPI, I2C, etc. drivers. Test
them and validate.

That is why we now "just" convert only U-Boot proper to DM/DTS. 

As a follow up - it seems pragmatic to not touch SPL for now, and start
the conversion ONLY when necessary drivers gain support for OF_PLATDATA
(so we don't need DTS support in SPL).

Unfortunately, it would take some time.


Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma at denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190526/1b2f8768/attachment.sig>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-26  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-25 16:49 [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: Remove CONFIG_SPL_FS_EXT4 for all MX6 platforms Ezequiel Garcia
2019-05-25 20:15 ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-25 21:47   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-05-25 22:24     ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-25 22:45       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-05-25 22:57         ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-25 23:08           ` Tom Rini
2019-05-25 23:20             ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-25 23:23               ` Tom Rini
2019-05-25 23:30                 ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-26  0:33                   ` Tom Rini
2019-05-26  2:58                     ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-26  8:22                   ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2019-05-26 10:45                     ` Tom Rini
2019-05-26 11:46                       ` Lukasz Majewski
2019-05-26 11:52                         ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-26 12:30                         ` Tom Rini
2019-05-26 15:04                           ` Lukasz Majewski
2019-05-26 16:18                             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-05-26 17:30                               ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-27  2:59                                 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-05-27  3:33                                   ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 10:39           ` Stefano Babic
2019-05-31 10:42             ` Fabio Estevam
2019-05-31 12:17               ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 12:18                 ` Fabio Estevam
2019-05-31 12:20                   ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 12:42                     ` Tom Rini
2019-05-31 12:46                       ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 12:51                         ` Tom Rini
2019-05-31 12:57                           ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 13:08                             ` Tom Rini
2019-05-31 13:22                               ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 13:31                                 ` Tom Rini
2019-05-31 13:40                                   ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 12:43                     ` Fabio Estevam
2019-05-31 12:45                       ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 12:51                         ` Fabio Estevam
2019-05-31 12:58                           ` Marek Vasut
2019-05-31 13:08                             ` Tom Rini
2019-05-31 12:24             ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190526102200.796afadc@jawa \
    --to=lukma@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.