All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, colin.king@canonical.com,
	yuehaibing@huawei.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: Avoid possible double calls to b43_one_core_detach()
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 12:43:55 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190528124355.5D9D960F38@smtp.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190504091000.18665-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>

Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com> wrote:

> In b43_request_firmware(), when ieee80211_register_hw() fails,
> b43_one_core_detach() is called. In b43_bcma_remove() and
> b43_ssb_remove(), b43_one_core_detach() is called again. In this case, 
> null-pointer dereferences and double-free problems can occur when 
> the driver is removed.
> 
> To fix this bug, the call to b43_one_core_detach() in
> b43_request_firmware() is deleted.
> 
> This bug is found by a runtime fuzzing tool named FIZZER written by us.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

ec2e93cf1910 b43: Avoid possible double calls to b43_one_core_detach()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10929623/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches


      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-04  9:10 [PATCH] net: wireless: b43: Avoid possible double calls to b43_one_core_detach() Jia-Ju Bai
2019-05-06  8:21 ` Kalle Valo
2019-05-28 12:43 ` Kalle Valo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190528124355.5D9D960F38@smtp.codeaurora.org \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.