Re: next/pending-fixes boot: 227 boots: 6 failed, 198 passed with 20 offline, 1 untried/unknown, 2 conflicts (v5.2-rc1-375-g3695b18d1e9cd)

[Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>]

Hello,

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:37:15PM -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
> +Eduardo
> 
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:09 PM Andy Gross <andygro@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 4:51 PM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Sorry for breaking the boot on 8064. That was one of the platforms
> > > that I didn't convert over to regmap (needs more refactoring). I had
> > > hoped kernelci would catch any issues but looks like thermal-soc tree
> > > entered linux-next quite late and didn't catch this.
> > >
> > > Does reverting 3e6a8fb33084 ("drivers: thermal: tsens: Add new
> > > operation to check if a sensor is enabled") fix the issue? If so,
> > > reverting that commit might be the best course of action since I've
> > > started vacations and can't fix this for 8064 in a meaningful amount
> > > of time (until 3rd week of June). cc'ing Bjorn in case this needs more
> > > investigation, but I think that patch is fairly self contained and
> > > reverting it shouldn't have any knock-on effects.
> >
> > I am ok with this.  I'll check with Bjorn before adding this to a
> > fixes for -rc2.
> >
> 
> Eduardo, we have a situation with the Qcom tsens driver and
> commit  3e6a8fb33084.  Do you mind if I send in a revert for this through
> my tree or can you do this for us for -rc2?

I can revert this patch. I can confirm that it is selfcontained and
reverting seams to work. I am sending the revert to -rc3, as rc2 is
already out.

> 
> Thanks,
> Andy