From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Dianzhang Chen <dianzhangchen0@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sys.c: fix possible spectre-v1 in do_prlimit()
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 15:18:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190529121831.GU11013@uranus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFbcbMAi_QhoT=JyU6NjNiJJwFbXF4Z1eV8TtfLv9UWJT-K_CQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:39:52AM +0800, Dianzhang Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although when detect it is misprediction and drop the execution, but
> it can not drop all the effects of speculative execution, like the
> cache state. During the speculative execution, the:
>
>
> rlim = tsk->signal->rlim + resource; // use resource as index
>
> ...
>
> *old_rlim = *rlim;
>
>
> may read some secret data into cache.
>
> and then the attacker can use side-channel attack to find out what the
> secret data is.
This code works after check_prlimit_permission call, which means you already
should have a permission granted. And you implies that misprediction gonna
be that deep which involves a number of calls/read/writes/jumps/locks-rb-wb-flushes
and a bunch or other instructions, moreover all conditions are "mispredicted".
This is very bold and actually unproved claim!
Note that I pointed the patch is fine in cleanup context but seriously I
don't see how this all can be exploitable in sense of spectre.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-29 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAFbcbMATqCCpCR596FTaSdUV50nQSxDgXMd1ASgXu1CE+DJqTw@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-28 7:10 ` [PATCH] kernel/sys.c: fix possible spectre-v1 in do_prlimit() Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-05-29 2:39 ` Dianzhang Chen
2019-05-29 12:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2019-05-30 5:45 ` Dianzhang Chen
2019-05-30 7:58 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-05-27 7:23 Dianzhang Chen
2019-05-27 7:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190529121831.GU11013@uranus \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=dianzhangchen0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.