From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957D8C28CC1 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5664C27528 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559398165; bh=wRQ4/MOdycv1GQIW12sTX6DVY3DNRWYhHmUEmxWsJlA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=2DcsJ8AtrcbJ3xL0f7zjbiAxr05jcc4hgP4kOVsZh66AnQZHTQP+HzLZI78fekHmk dYK2ScF1lgwdS9oqR+sNmZKrXOTe78ALZnv0liTAVBHGtHFkOAwqjaCgX3afjC4FWH NmJSWInYsBFlJjpooZwPc0pPrfjtakW/d1dxgEy4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726148AbfFAOJY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jun 2019 10:09:24 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:40658 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726135AbfFAOJY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jun 2019 10:09:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HMgE4NOfuD1y+txLeI+CpHA2UOtahG0/vjKdYggheao=; b=BI0NZH7CMS5qwQH+X7P2rUCyKq C4NDI4lpOxmXhuv7hgwSFP4g12L3iMgycbQXH5oNmXnhU4KswqWv+bzFdwBQtHLHDT0rw8erAbOrt BbFSDDVHfcJ8Pnvncr5o9qNmq7vDWEK8F6dYQdDrmtnrm/HZmwRqFLmrPNPqNpO1cOMFAIl+ZtafM dNVMXRZaL/yynvdbPqJEYDpYxCAbmgz1gLXdk8DT4hjhBD2xHUEQ9LYmJ/5jSAnyO6uW1G/xP7Zub ib8qXGRBqopD3YU2f+rQbEmOGwpG97in4DY8aePNnnZhtS8V1PpKtsCWZlxV/AvNsXlIYXNNuYtLk ws1H2IEA==; Received: from 179.187.96.185.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br ([179.187.96.185] helo=coco.lan) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hX4hG-0005ke-KU for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 14:09:23 +0000 Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 11:09:19 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Patchwork version upgrade Message-ID: <20190601110919.2ea904ef@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190531124050.3f06e1b8@coco.lan> References: <20190531124050.3f06e1b8@coco.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, 31 May 2019 12:40:50 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > Hi all, >=20 > For a long time, we were running an old Patchwork version. The thing is t= hat > we had applied some patches on the top of it, and the upgrade was not > trivial. >=20 > Today, we upgraded it to its latest stable version. Just like before, > you can access it via: >=20 > https://patchwork.linuxtv.org >=20 > As this is a new version, please report if you find any issues on it. I found a minor issue at the database where 166 patches didn't have a commit message. On patchwork 2.1, the commit message is mandatory. Not having it prevents being able to change the patch status. After looking into it, it seems that this was due to some bugs with the initial versions of patchwork, as the database before the migration were also missing the data. This was fixed by setting the commit message with an empty value. =46rom all I see, this happened only with patches that were already applied, so it shouldn't be an issue. Yet, if you have any patches pending to be applied, it doesn't hurt to check if the commit message is empty at patchwork. Btw, I'm tagging all patches that aren't with "new", "under review" or "TODO" status to the archive. Regards Thanks, Mauro