From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mojha@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH HACK RFC] cpu: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 18:12:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190602011253.GA6167@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Scheduling-clock interrupts can arrive late in the CPU-offline process,
after idle entry and the subsequent call to cpuhp_report_idle_dead().
Once execution passes the call to rcu_report_dead(), RCU is ignoring
the CPU, which results in lockdep complaints when the interrupt handler
uses RCU:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.2.0-rc1+ #681 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kernel/sched/fair.c:9542 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by swapper/5/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc1+ #681
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
dump_stack+0x5e/0x8b
trigger_load_balance+0xa8/0x390
? tick_sched_do_timer+0x60/0x60
update_process_times+0x3b/0x50
tick_sched_handle+0x2f/0x40
tick_sched_timer+0x32/0x70
__hrtimer_run_queues+0xd3/0x3b0
hrtimer_interrupt+0x11d/0x270
? sched_clock_local+0xc/0x74
smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x200
apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
</IRQ>
RIP: 0010:delay_tsc+0x22/0x50
Code: ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 65 44 8b 05 18 a7 11 48 0f ae e8 0f 31 48 89 d6 48 c1 e6 20 48 09 c6 eb 0e f3 90 65 8b 05 fe a6 11 48 <41> 39 c0 75 18 0f ae e8 0f 31 48 c1 e2 20 48 09 c2 48 89 d0 48 29
RSP: 0000:ffff8f92c0157ed0 EFLAGS: 00000212 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: ffff8c861f356400 RCX: ffff8f92c0157e64
RDX: 000000321214c8cc RSI: 00000032120daa7f RDI: 0000000000260f15
RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8c861ee18000 R15: ffff8c861ee18000
cpuhp_report_idle_dead+0x31/0x60
do_idle+0x1d5/0x200
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40
cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
start_secondary+0x151/0x170
secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This happens rarely, but can be forced by happen more often by
placing delays in cpuhp_report_idle_dead() following the call to
rcu_report_dead(). With this in place, the folloiwng rcutorture
scenario reproduces the problem within a few minute:
tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 8 --duration 5 --kconfig "CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y" --configs "TREE04"
This commit uses the crude by effective expedient of disabling interrupts
via local_irq_disable() just prior to the call to rcu_report_dead().
This passes light testing. Of course, preventing the scheduling-clock
interrupt might be preferable. However, this commit does have the
advantage of allowing progress to be made on other RCU bugs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 448efc06bb2d..3b33d83b793d 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ void cpuhp_report_idle_dead(void)
struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st = this_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state);
BUG_ON(st->state != CPUHP_AP_OFFLINE);
+ local_irq_disable();
rcu_report_dead(smp_processor_id());
st->state = CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD;
udelay(1000);
next reply other threads:[~2019-06-02 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-02 1:12 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-06-03 8:38 ` [PATCH HACK RFC] cpu: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-03 11:44 ` Mark Rutland
2019-06-03 13:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-04 7:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-04 13:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-08 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-11 13:14 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-11 13:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-11 14:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-11 19:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-04 8:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-04 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190602011253.GA6167@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mojha@codeaurora.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.