From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id DCF55E00D38; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.128.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com (mail-wm1-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B356E00CAA for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 07:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id w9so2001wmd.1 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 07:05:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=melangex-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ffhyBPzW1jOnDZWlQ7gb0kQKRomXoyj/3TeuxdY05G8=; b=b0vbkFFzVyXT/ggYZ0giwpkDFuqYSJgrtbtrm2TMGZn6vDeIbyRxO5M1UR/fVSVmGw ivG6j0I0y5vKmR6oUDwSJxCl/OiCNpS+2lDJms2XRrA+jmaJxuYc/fK1le7RvjmLTxab FnRZfY7nCGsZkF6fpSE1PDyT5tOgASsDSsphXWY8dhz3vGDLsT3ABX2PkkVv4EHglIpA FmY3AkLq+VfHRTQpi+p++cSbYjkWrzQxLODqKfRFiiQ8sUKF++Kizwj2twFd6GcTlGhL /BOsaaZLHmvC067OnzQbetUqdiDOR+jpPT3O7hO50C6DIAJTLRbDWzQZi7fr7pHnEfSw ktQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ffhyBPzW1jOnDZWlQ7gb0kQKRomXoyj/3TeuxdY05G8=; b=DTg75U0MfVDK/BWY9v1iNvM7QeIC2Qjw8qtTolgoPdHN7+A97S7/uJn1xnn/IYXsJx nD3iO8bHYarkbBOclMrs15dinq6x2j5BgtlkIvEn/L7dLZ+lTJnKa7/iIEUqwt02XA3F ASrYqjEw+Zk07uBCmDPyCoMQxZBdsrfhSm7j8Fykv44zw0nmW+Hrp0g/c6aza0fdPdCm novoHKXb15zULHSZ5dYH9ErRDprtFeUr9fnktpDYDy8aCP5g8LVdQ7WX6fyDmTKIhwZU dMlV2BFEPBVANHaghHqEE4quc7kx07CWw+ep0zdk1HJVHhle15U+/zRrty05vJyPAQFj sbLw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV6Vnncbi1tVAYLG8FhNJj66Q/xEoNCfedBlPvreWYnwKomXYT9 OQjB6HQxoiMMi1R8Fcosy+jnGgxrJ48= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+beekIHFSCQCIZXjvyutSUqRNb4ca2V2YHH5IjuQ8clpqPyR3MFI2ILSQrUovrQ7y2OIJMA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a783:: with SMTP id q125mr2566162wme.94.1559570750156; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 07:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([209.203.60.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16sm28262055wrg.49.2019.06.03.07.05.48 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 07:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Morn=C3=A9_Lamprecht?= Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:05:46 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morn=E9?= Lamprecht To: yocto Message-ID: <20190603140546.GA28701@archworkstation> Mail-Followup-To: yocto References: <20190601144016.GA19383@archworkstation> <20190601182556.GB19383@archworkstation> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Subject: Re: do_rootfs fails while attempting to install hostapd package X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 14:05:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >Which startup system do you use (sysVinit or >systemd)? You can take a look at >poky/meta/classed/update-rc.d.bbclass which >checks various parameters and try to debug it >(by adding some printouts). By my guess is that >some misconfiguration between systemd/sysvinit >must cause this issue. Adding DISTRO_FEATURES_remove += " sysvinit" to my distro conf file, solved the problem. I also have DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFULL_CONSIDERED = "sysvinit" in my config (also had it during the failed builds), I thought it would prevent sysvinit from being added/backfilled to the DISTRO features ? So I'm not sure why DISTRO_FEATURES_remove is also required in this case ? - Morné